How did the goverment proctect the rights of a child, before the introduction of the United nations convention on the rights of the child.?(UNCRC), and have these rights improved the welbeing of the child?
2007-03-24 10:24:26 · 4 answers · asked by lastofthewonderfullpeople 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Children have no real rights in this country. Their only rights are negative ones, that is , a parent or guardian has to have violated a law or the child protection act by omission or commission! In other words abusive or neglectful!
2007-03-24 10:30:36 · answer #1 · answered by cantcu 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
human rights of children is a con, the best right they could have, is two parents mam and dad, but the government dont like the family unit, because its unity. and the adults are being systematicaly corrupted, it is in the childs interest that should not happen it is also in the childs interest that the ruination of the adult does not fall on their shoulders, but it does.the girl child is going tobecome a sex object, and the boy child is eventualy going to be corrupted by the sex objects, they are going to become coppies of our rotten system where great money is being made by ruining peoples lives, now the children may find themselves with two fathers or two mothers which is a corrupt version of family life. and non of thisproblems is going to be sorted by any large organisation because of the economic value of ruining the family unit.
2007-03-24 11:05:41 · answer #2 · answered by trucker 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There are international approved elements of protection in the Human Rights legislation that are missing from the national curriculum.
2007-03-24 10:37:48 · answer #3 · answered by K. Marx iii 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Which government? Are you talking about the US government? How many children do you think they have murdered in Afghanistan and Iraq? And Somalia.
2007-03-24 10:36:51 · answer #4 · answered by airmonkey1001 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋