I'd get a divorce - that's a huge thing to be lied to about!!
2007-03-24 10:10:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Zabes 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
This is one of the most unfair thing a person could ever do to another. I would leave. The reason is. I had a right to know who and what this person was an is.
Yes I would feel it has to do with a gay thing. I would be saying like "Whoa" I am not gay. And only a gay person has a sex change. And I ain't into sleeping with gay people. No one has a right to keep something like that from their lover or spouse!
2007-03-24 17:13:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well - I would hope you would get to know your spouse better than that BEFORE you married. If you didn't - then it would be considered a HUGE lie. That is the part that would be hard to get past. The fact that they didn't tell you so you could make your decision to marry on that. The fact that there was a gender change may not be near as big as the lying factor. I knew my husband since we were in jr high - so I don't have any concerns about his past haunting us. There are no secrets there - we both know what we were like. Good, bad & ugly.
2007-03-24 17:11:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by lucki female 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
IF it was real love, then it wouldn't really matter. There would be a bit of a trust issue, but I would also realize why I was lied to. I think I would stay. But since I'm already married to the love of my life and I know he was never a woman, I'll never have to test this issue.â¼
No you wouldn't be a lesbian, or gay. Genetically they would be the opposite as you know them, but physically they would be as you know them. Does that make sense?
2007-03-24 17:14:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
If I was deeply in love with a person and some time during our relationship that fact was told to me, I would see it as a very courageous thing to do and would probably feel even better about them.
On the other hand, if I was deeply in love with a person and some time during our relationship that fact was "discovered" I would have serious doubts about their trustworthiness. I would see it as a lie by omission.
2007-03-24 17:27:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I saw something like that on Dr. Phil or some crap like that. Honestly, if you fall in love with someone, it's for that person. You can't pick who you fall in love with. If my husband turned out to have been a woman in his past, I'd say, "wow, no wonder he always knew what I was thinking!"
2007-03-24 17:10:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by trikelkelley 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
If I was deeply in love with this person it would not make any difference to me but I might lose trust because he didn't tell me before we got married. What if I wanted his child and couldn't have one then??
2007-03-24 17:10:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would consider it a lie if it was told after the relationship had begun...therefore it is an issue of trust...once trust is broken it can not be fixed
without trust you have no relationship
I would leave
be cool...
2007-03-24 17:12:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by CC Babydoll 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think that most FTM would be obvious. I mean their going to be really short with small hands...
Wait I just described my husband...
Hhhmmm. I've got some thinking to do.
2007-03-24 17:12:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
the bible says that men should not lay with men and women with women so if he or she was once the oppisite sex i woul;d leave
2007-03-24 17:16:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋