first they have a question on their homepage from the wicked witch of the northeast, hillary clinton....and now Y!A has one from barack saddam hussein obama. It is one thing to be insanely bias, but do they have to rub it in my face and try to insult my intelligence? I would like to see a question from someone that isn't a washed up nobody like clinton or a never-has-been like obama. who is next, al gore? john edwards? keep 'em coming Y!A.
2007-03-24 10:05:00 · 12 answers · asked by Matt 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
mccain is a pseudo-conservative but your point has been taken.
2007-03-24 10:11:33 · update #1
but ford, my question isn't on the Y!A homepage with 800 stars and 3,000 answers like hillary. that's the difference
2007-03-24 10:28:09 · update #2
Easy there, killer.
2007-03-24 14:37:24 · answer #1 · answered by Wendy 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Left wing bias is a myth. As proof, your question is here. If there were more Right Wing question, I would assume that there were a Right Wing majority. If you perceive a Left wing majority, then it might be that there are fewer people with your extreme views. It is your fallacious determination that since there are fewer people like you here, that means that they are being kept out and that there is a Liberal conspiracy of some sort. It might very well be that you have a minority view...but I see no lack of extreme Right wing questions and answers here, so I think your just wrong on all fronts.
I personally very well might be biased, as you might be biased to our view points, but (we) I am a private person and have that right...Are you complaining about personal bias? I can't see any group asking about the proper dress code of the neo-nazis or a Neo-Con question such as, whether illegal aliens should have minimum wage or it is OK to just give them food. It's a question of suitability, the questions about Obama were by him and the other side, if it proposed a decent question could not be un-included. If the question is in good taste, it should be brought to the front as was Obama's. Show me a question by the Right that is in good taste and proposed by a prominent Right winger and was not highlighted and I might believe you...but it looks like you are just complaining about the predominence of tasteful Left questions...so the real problem may be that the Right' very position of being pro-war, pro "big brother" and pro corporation does nothing for most people and does not represent the interest of the majority or is in it's basis not polite conversation
2007-03-24 10:24:37 · answer #2 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
So anyone who allows a liberal politician to speak has 'liberal bias'? Of course. The only way to eliminate bias and restore objectivity is to prevent anyone with an opinion different from yours from speaking, right? Then we'll have proper freedom.
And also, John McCain had a question on here recently. Oh, that terrible liberal bias.
2007-03-24 10:08:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
First of all, Gore was actually elected president in 2000, Bush stole the election with the help of his little brother and a cohort of Jeb's. Secondly, there is NO liberal bias here. Just because someone disagrees with your opinion doesn't mean they have liberal bias.
2007-03-24 10:24:34 · answer #4 · answered by iwannarevolt 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
As a Democrat who does not hate one million/2 the country, i visit assist you recognize quite: I even have seen it swing the two techniques. I observe that categorical cases of day swing in specific guidelines, and each so often this is extremely extreme. i could say, "No", i've got not observed a stable everlasting swing in the two direction, keep for the period of specific events. enable's all shop speaking up, we would desire to?
2016-11-23 12:38:50 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't pay much attention to those featured questions anyway. But, why don't you go ahead and get politicians you like to set up an account here and start a dialog with people? Let us know when that happens.
2007-03-24 10:14:00 · answer #6 · answered by mattzcoz 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Balance is sometimes used in reference to political content in the mass media.
2007-03-24 10:50:21 · answer #7 · answered by Nyaru 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are correct. I do not know how many answers that I have made have been nuked by their lib mediators or have been unfairly blasted out by libs that read them. Oops here it goes again.
2007-03-24 10:56:51 · answer #8 · answered by STEVE S 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
How about that ad she's running 24/7 as well? LOL!
2007-03-24 10:11:25 · answer #9 · answered by bugeyes 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
maybe you don't make as much sense as she does. Then your stars would come.
2007-03-24 10:39:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hardly. . .they just seem to be in step with the future.
2007-03-24 10:21:07 · answer #11 · answered by kobacker59 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋