Is it Memphis or Boston or the bucks
2007-03-24 08:24:21 · 17 answers · asked by OJ Mayo the Warriors fan 5 in Sports ➔ Basketball
Take the injuries out and you cannot possible count the Bucks in that conversation. That said, Memphis is worse than the Celtics. The Celtics only suck because the administration sucks and Boston fans suck and want their team to lost so that they can get Kevin Durant. They are low like that and probably still will not win even with Durant/Oden.
2007-03-24 08:28:12 · answer #1 · answered by Shawn Sizzle 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
not memphis, not boston, and not the bucks...all of those are not in the convo because there key players have been most of the season...the overall record doesn't really determine if they are the worst team or not...
...the teams that should be in this conversation are Portland TrailBlazers and Seattle Supersonics. ...
Portland actually has a future with Brandon Roy and future all-star Zach Randolph....
Seattle is really going no where, they have no inside game, no future, no youth, no experience, and there management/ coaching is just horrible. ... Ray Allen and Rashard Lewis cannot do it all since they are mostly perimiter players..... and Ray Allen is beginning to get old...Seattle is by far the worst team.... and the funny thing is that there team has been fairly healthy the whole year
2007-03-24 08:38:37 · answer #2 · answered by xxknomexx 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Memphis
2007-03-24 09:18:07 · answer #3 · answered by sublimedude777 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Memphis Grizzlies. The Celtics & Bucks both suffered from injuries and both appear to have a solid nucleus. (Paul Pierce, Al Jefferson, & Michael Redd, Charlie Villenauva)
The Grizzlies on the other hand have nothing else besides Gasol, and they are actively shopping him.
So definitely the Grizz's.
2007-03-24 08:32:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
terrific-Lakers might have the terrific checklist interior the West (back) yet i think of Miami might have the terrific checklist interior the East and in all possibility over all, inspite of the undeniable fact that it relies upon on how they build that team... Orlando is likewise a contender for having the terrific over all checklist yet i ought to be sure Miami getting the main wins next season WORST-Toronto... they lose their terrific participant in Bosh, who's arguably a good 10 participant interior the league suitable now... and that they weren't even a sturdy team with Bosh... who is going to be of their starter 5 next 300 and sixty 5 days? so yeah Toronto might have the worst checklist interior the East jointly as Minnesota could be on the backside of the West... although Golden State ought to undertaking the two communities for the worst over all
2016-12-08 10:15:53 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
definitely Memphis
2007-03-24 08:26:57 · answer #6 · answered by NONAME 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Memphis, they dont have a lot of team chemistry
2007-03-24 08:42:26 · answer #7 · answered by Nas 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there is no way its boston, boston was so bad for so long because paul pierce was out. since hes been back its been 100 times better. AND BOSTON FANS RULE
Memphis just straight up blows
2007-03-24 08:32:45 · answer #8 · answered by Nate 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i agree, the bucks aren't in this argument. I'd say the team doing the least with what they have is the knicks, but the worst team overall is memphis.kinda repeating, but its the truth
2007-03-24 08:30:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have to say the Grizzlies. Gasol has been back for a long time and they still suck. They are like the post-Jordan/Pippen Bulls. They have a solid post player (Gasol vs Brand), a lot of young, talented players (Gay/Warrick vs Artest/ B. Miller), but they are just clueless as to how to win.
2007-03-24 09:32:00 · answer #10 · answered by 13 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋