I have a ton of them and they're all mint condition and uncirculated.
Any smartass 25c comments will not be appreciated.
2007-03-24 07:47:17 · 13 answers · asked by Rachel 6 in Games & Recreation ➔ Hobbies & Crafts
Okay then, how about a 1948 quarter?
2007-03-24 08:07:28 · update #1
The question on 1976 quarter has been answered.
As for the 1948 quarter, if it's from Philadelphia mint(no mint mark) in average circulated it's worth $2.50, almost uncirculated is $3 and uncirculated from $5. If the quarter is from San Francisco mint(with small "S" under the wreath) the values are about the same as its Philly counterpart. But if it's from Denver mint(with small "D"), then it's worth about 40% more than values of the other 2 mints. Values quoted here are retail prices. 1948 quarters are made of silver(90% silver composition) so even in very worn condition, it's worth at least 7x the face value.
2007-03-24 10:28:19 · answer #1 · answered by silverpet 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are worth very little because of the huge amount made .
1976 Phila 809,784,016
1976 Denver 860,118,839
1976San Fransico -Proof 7,059,099
1976Silver Clad 11,000,000
1976 silver clad proof 4,000,000
The 1948 quarter in circulated condition is worth 7 times face value just in silver content.
2007-03-24 22:41:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They minted 809,784,016 of them and most were saved, so that should tell you something. There is no dealer bid listed and in high mint state, you can buy the for a $1. Hold on to it as memory on the bicentennial or spend it. Not all coins are worth a lot of money no matter how old they are. The mintage was just to high and a lot were saved. Sorry to disappoint you.
2007-03-24 15:43:53 · answer #3 · answered by Taiping 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
According to CoinValues March edition, Bicentennial quarters in MS-63 retail for $1.00 each and MS-64's retail for $2.00 each. Of course I have always thought CoinValues tended to overstate their values. Also these prices are retail, not what a dealer would pay for the coins.
With that in mind the "smartass" response might be correct.
2007-03-24 15:13:00 · answer #4 · answered by BD in NM 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That would be the bicentennial quarter. They would probably sell for be tween $0.50 and $1.00 if they are mint sets. Uncirculated, probably $0.25. They made a lot of them, so they aren't that rare. Multiple coin sets from 1976 would be more valuable.
2007-03-24 14:54:41 · answer #5 · answered by danny_boy_jones 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
25 cents. Oh, sorry, I just read your additional comments. Mint and uncirculated quarters, though, really do not have any higher value than plain old face value. This isn't a smart comment. It's just a fact.
2007-03-24 14:49:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
They'd be appropriate, however. Those aren't old enough or rare enough to really be worth any more than face value -- unless you have a misprint or first issue or something rare like that. Bicentennials aren't considered rare yet, The only value they'd have other than face value is purely sentimental.
2007-03-24 14:50:56 · answer #7 · answered by thejanith 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Call it smart *** or whatever but a 1976 quarter is only worth 25 cents!
2007-03-24 14:51:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I will give you 2 1984 dimes & a 2002 nickle for it.
2007-03-24 14:50:12 · answer #9 · answered by jbro13 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If it is 1965+ then it is common, i know, i have two setsof 1965-1998(no S mints) and am an ongoing cocin collector...except for anni. quarters...they are about a dollor...
2007-03-24 14:58:26 · answer #10 · answered by Altadorian 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋