English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The Oklahoma City Bombing


On April 19th 1995 , a bomb ripped threw the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City , killing 168 men , women and children .

The bomb was blamed on the " people's militias " , Timothy McViegh and Terry Nichols , but the question is did they have a hand in it ? Or was it problem , reaction , solution ? I guess you will have to decide .

First let me explain what exactly is problem , reaction , solution . Problem , reaction , solution is manipulation to the highest degree , for example , say a politician wants to have more cameras in the neighborhood and a more authoritarian police force , well he can't just go out and say there will be more cameras in the neighborhood and a tougher police force , because people would rebel and his plan would have no chance at succeeding . He wants people to demand these things . So you have more high profile crime , you have more news reports all over the area keeping people in fear for their lives . Achieve that and people will demand those cameras and the authoritarian police force . It's as simple as that , you just have to see it before it happens .

Let's move on to the Oklahoma City bombing . In the weeks and months leading up to the Oklahoma City bombing , the American media was constantly talking about how the government was going after these so called militias . The bomb hit and it was blamed on not just a few people but { you guessed it } the whole of the militia movement . What was the governments response ? To use the bomb as an excuse to increase the powers of the F.B.I. to infiltrate and attack these groups and as Bill Clinton put it " to ease restrictions on the involvement of the military in domestic law enforcement " . The goal is to eventually use the military in the streets of America , in place of the police .

The F.B.I. , Bill Clinton and Janet Reno , claim that one explosion destroyed the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building , and that the bomb was made by former U.S. soldier Timothy McViegh and Terry Nichols from fertilizer and fuel oil . Ted Gunderson a man with 28 years experience with the F.B.I. believes the official explanation to be both " ridiculous and impossible " . Gunderson and others within the F.B.I. believe that the blast was actually caused by a electro hydrodynamic gaseous fuel device , known as a barometric bomb . To know how to make this bomb you would need clearance at the highest levels of the United States Government and Military combined . The barometric bomb has Q clearance which puts it on a level with security and secrecy with nuclear weapons components . If Gunderson is correct someone like McViegh { who was just a regular foot solider } and the others charged with him , could not possibly have such knowledge or resources , the idea would be ludicrous .

According to Gunderson the bomb was exactly in line with what the barometric bomb would do . It works like this - there is first a explosion and this releases a lethal cloud of chemicals , ammonium nitrate and aluminum silicate . The cloud is energized and there is a second blast seconds later using another explosive called PDTN , which creates an explosion of greater magnitude then TNT . To confirm that this bomb was used and not the fuel oil bomb , there would have to be traces all over the debris and on someone's clothes ........

At a court hearing in El Reno , Oklahoma on April 28th 1995 , the F.B.I. Special Agent , John Hersley , said a shirt McViegh was wearing , when arrested , contained traces of the explosive { wait for it } - PDTN . The Oklahoma Geological Survey at the University of Oklahoma , revealed that there had been two explosions , ten seconds apart . The first explosion went off at 9:02 am and 13 seconds and the second at 9:02 am and 23 seconds . This could not happen in anyway with a fertilizer bomb, for which there is no evidence anyway . Other bomb experts say the official explanation is ridiculous as well . Debris from the Murrah building , was pilled up against the general records office across the street on the other side of the truck , which supposedly exploded with the fuel fertilizer bomb . The only way this could have happened is if there was a bomb inside the building not outside , as the government claimed . The government has consistently increased the size of the fertilizer bomb it claims was built by McViegh , because the size of the bomb and the devastation don't match up . It was first announced that the bomb weighed 1,000pounds ,but this has increased to reach 4,800 pounds and so the vehicle used to carry it , changed quite a bit . The fertilizer bomb would have scattered fertilizer all over the sight , but reports from the day the bomb went off , report " not one ounce of fertilizer was found " . Also Michael J. Riconosciuto revealed to Spotlight , that records and components were stolen in two raids on a well guarded warehouse in Aberdeen , Washington State in 1988 . " On the first occasion the people involved were arrested and let go and on the second occasion the police watched the robbers carry out the raid and yet did nothing " .

So many question's , so little answers . I wonder when this will all be settled and the truth finally comes out . Wait , I forgot , Timothy McViegh is dead and the American people don't care .

2007-03-24 07:45:04 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

I wrote this about 6 months ago and put it on my webpage and I talked to many people who are mentioned in this piece anyway here are some links - http://intelwire.egoplex.com/trentadueindex.html , http://deseretnews.com/dn/print/1,1442,660197443,00.html , http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=46983 , http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/OK/ok.html , http://kutv.com/topstories/local_story_315122423.html , http://intelwire.egoplex.com/2006_11_05_exclusives.html , http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=47447 , http://intelwire.egoplex.com/2006_03_30_exclusives.html , http://www.sandersresearch.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1137&Itemid=74 , http://intelwire.egoplex.com/2006_11_20_exclusives.html , http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/conspiracy_files/6213816.stm

2007-03-24 08:21:42 · update #1

5 answers

I would certainly like to see your sources. It is interesting and I hate to say it, but not outside the realm of reality. It seems that President Clinton liked to "Wag the dog" as a diversionary tactic. I still believe McVeigh was involved, but perhaps he got some training. We will never know I suspect.
A society of sheep must beget a government of wolves.

2007-03-24 07:47:35 · answer #1 · answered by EB 2 · 1 0

I do believe McVeigh could know how to make a bomb like that, and I could probably figure it out to.

The sources about the weight change would be interesting to see.

A more likely story is that the FBI/CIA knew about the bombing, but let it happen anyway so they could increase powers. And the nursery was purposely put in a known target, so that the American people would be further outraged. I don't think it's linked with Clinton, I think it goes back to Lyndon Johnson. The same argument could be said for 9/11.

2007-03-24 08:06:36 · answer #2 · answered by dude 5 · 3 0

I don't need to read some cut and paste POS article to know it was a terrorist attack. McVeigh was in league with the Muslim terrorists for that bombing. It well documented.

2007-03-24 07:54:21 · answer #3 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 1 1

violent act? check
intimidate people? check
targeting civilians to achieve political gains? check and check

No matter how bad the FBI did in trying to stop it, it was still a terror attack.

2007-03-24 07:54:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

So whats the need to ask a question?

You answered your question with this.

2007-03-24 08:01:56 · answer #5 · answered by slickny8111 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers