You can work this out by finding their common denominator.
6/7<7/8
48/56<49/56
2007-03-24 07:28:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by ! 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
You know that 1/8 is smaller than 1/7 because if you divide something into 8 parts, the parts will be smaller than if you divide something into 7 parts.
6/7 is 1/7 less than a whole, and 7/8 is 1/8 less than a whole. Since 1/8 is smaller than 1/7, 7/8 is closer to a whole than 6/7 is, and is therefore bigger.
2007-03-24 14:52:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by JaniesTiredShoes 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
6/7 is smaller because see if u do find common denominator than it would be 48/56 and 7/8 would be 49/56
2007-03-24 14:41:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by jamo796 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because 1/7 is larger than 1/8...just as 1/2 is larger than1/3.
Thus to take 1/7 from the whole is to take more than to take 1/8 from the whole
Therefore 7/8 is more than 6/7.
2007-03-25 12:21:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by CuriousSam 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
1) Let U = (7/8) - (6/7)
2) U = ( 7 * 7 ) / 56 - (6 * 8) / 56 = (49 - 48) / 56 = 1 / 56
3) Since U > 0 (7/8) must be greater than (6/7)
2007-03-24 14:44:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by 1988_Escort 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
it is smaller becasue if you take the lcd(lowest common denominator) it would be 48 over 56 and 7 over eight would be 49/56 so than 48 would be less than forty nine.So that is why 6/7 is less than 7/8. ANother way is using fraction bars.Also because 8 is bigger than 6...lol...no its because 6/7 is basically 6.5 and 7/8 is 7.5....about a size different. it is less because ..................
2007-03-24 14:29:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by jaya 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
.1-1/7 is bigger than 1-1/8 because we took a smaller part to the first.
2007-03-24 15:07:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Houcem 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Set up a bar graph and it will become clear in a hurry.
Seven squares in a row and eight in a row.,
2007-03-24 15:57:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Beejee 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
because 8 is bigger than 6...lol...no its because 6/7 is basically 6.5 and 7/8 is 7.5....about a size different...
2007-03-24 14:29:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by invisible 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
be cuz it is...... duh.... some people that r payed to say so said so
2007-03-24 14:44:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋