English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

By voting for the one/s you want to stay, you can't always get all the votes for all the good contestants that should stay. If the worst performer was voted off, it would be more accurate. This leads to some of the better contestants, or mediocre ones leaving way before some of the very worst.

2007-03-24 07:24:38 · 5 answers · asked by B Wiz 2 in Entertainment & Music Television

5 answers

b/c they're more worst singers than there are good singers. And those worst singers make for entertaining television.

2007-03-24 07:30:31 · answer #1 · answered by ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ 4 · 0 0

That would make no sense. Nobody votes for the worst. We all want the best. That's why we're voting for Sanjaya!

2007-03-24 07:58:08 · answer #2 · answered by Kitten Hood 5 · 0 1

Huh? Ya mean it doesn't?

I been voting for Sanjaya from the start. No wonder he keeps comin' back.

2007-03-24 07:38:41 · answer #3 · answered by Toeless_Joe_Jackson 5 · 1 0

Good question! I wished that it did do that sometimes.

2007-03-24 07:41:34 · answer #4 · answered by raven_geisha 2 · 0 0

because howard stern does.

2007-03-24 07:28:59 · answer #5 · answered by matts 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers