www.youtube.com/user/ParkRidge47
2007-03-24 07:23:54 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
i think it's cool how the guy got the ipod on that runner. i don't think that was put on there in the apple version that came out a few years ago.
2007-03-24 07:56:52 · answer #1 · answered by curious_One 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's crap.
Have you ever read the book 1984? It's about the way Communism treats people. The author based it on Stalin's reign.
Some people believe MS. Clinton would make it that way, especially since she said things like this:
"The only way to make a difference is to acquire power" (p. 68).
(From the book "I've Always Been A Yankee Fan" by Thomas D. Kuiper, p. 68 - Hillary to a friend before starting law school.)
"We just can't trust the American people to make those types of choices.... Government has to make those choices for people"
(From the book "I've Always Been A Yankee Fan" by Thomas D. Kuiper, p. 20 - Hillary to Rep. Dennis Hastert in 1993 discussing her health care plan
"I am a fan of the social policies that you find in Europe" (p. 76). Hillary in 1996" (From the book "I've Always Been A Yankee Fan" by Thomas D. Kuiper, p. 76 - Hillary in 1996)
(Part of the U.S.S.R. was in Europe.)
Scary, huh?
By the way, Hillary's attempt to run for President is constitutionally, well, ILLEGAL - the Constitution specifies that the President "shall be a (married) man".
Why?
Well, the man-in-charge requirement could be an old thing, but it is only specified for the President of the United States. Any other office is specified as a "person" of "at least 25 years" old.
As far as the married part, being married is having a confidant and bouncing-board of the opposite gender. As in, two heads are better than one, and because male and female think differently, there should be one of each.
Madame Clinton is neither married nor male.
Personally, I think the marriage requirement should stay the way it is. But until the man thing gets amended specifically, a woman President will be in violation of our first written law...
Hillary would, then, only have to marry some guy in order to fulfill her duties as "President". (Hey, she put up with Bill!) =)
2007-03-24 07:55:11 · answer #2 · answered by Valerie G 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Let's just be clear it was NOT created by Obama or anyone in his campaign team. The guy who made it worked for the same company that designed his website, but he himself never met Obama or worked on his site. And the company fired him after he admitted to creating it.
It's a ridiculous ad because it's pitting two candidates on the same team against each other instead of trying to unify and strengthen the Democratic party. Strength and unity is what the party desperately needs right now if they have any hope of winning in 2008.
2007-03-24 07:43:36 · answer #3 · answered by samsona 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What struck me most was the actual words she was saying in her speech, before she was silenced by the sledgehammer.
Her speech was calling for everyone to have a voice, and everyone to work together and participate in the political process. Listen closely to the actual words of her speech.
So, by implication, she was silenced because she wanted people to stop fighting each other and work together.
2007-03-24 07:29:11 · answer #4 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I thought it was great!
The things that hit closest to home are the things that aggravate people who try to deceive!!
If I were Obama I would have been proud!
2007-03-24 07:29:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_CepS8u9wQ&NR
IT'LL JUST MAKE THE LIBS FEEL SORRY FOR HER.
2007-03-24 07:53:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋