Its just to silly to have primaries and all that stuff when the democrats only have to offer Hillary and Osama?
2007-03-24 07:06:48 · 19 answers · asked by Undecided Voter 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Egad, you're so funny!
No.
2007-03-24 11:45:59 · answer #1 · answered by Praise Singer 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No!!!!!Pres. Bush is not a leader, he is a follower! He has been abusing his political power to pursue his families money hungry personal agendas without any concern whatsoever about the lives of our troops and their families. Most of the people in this world, not just the United States, share close to the same opinion about our C average president. Not like this is any new news, but he even has personal ties to the Bin Laden family! Maybe that's why we haven't caught Osama yet! By the way, has Haliburton received any more government contracts lately?
2007-03-24 14:43:39 · answer #2 · answered by mascervezas26 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The is no question in my mind that you aren't for a democratic country. There must be an election regardless of who the candidates are. Reelect Bush again? It would probably be the end of the USA. He is a one man plague. The guy should never have been elected as our president. He is pure mediocrity and I am giving him a lot of credit that he doesn't deserve. If the guy graduated college with a "D" average he did well.
2007-03-25 03:41:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush should declare himself President For Life and dissolve Congress and declare Martial Law.
Why waste the people's time with all that stupid election stuff when we would obviously just be better off with Bush in charge permanently?
Maybe he could pass of the Presidency to his brilliant and capable children, the Bush twins, and save us the trouble of elections for at least another 30 or 40 years, to boot!
2007-03-25 02:01:41 · answer #4 · answered by barringtonbreathesagain 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You really should try reading the Constitution sometime.
The two-term limit is a Constitutional limit, and cannot be simply bypassed by Congress passing a statute.
But then again, since Bush is the current champion of the Anti-Constitution crowd, it's really not suprising that someone who wants him to remain in office hasn't read the Constitution.
2007-03-24 14:35:48 · answer #5 · answered by coragryph 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Lets see... so far 20 years straight of Bush Clinton rule... 16 of those years have been run by Bush's and now people have taken every opportunity to blame everything wrong on the 4 years the Clinton's had in office...
Yet things seem far worse than ever under Bush Jr...
So I'm forced to rationalize that Clinton screwed up pretty badly according to the neocons.... and Bush Jr has screwed everything up far worse... I know from personal experience....
SOOOOOOOO....
How about NO MORE BUSHES **OR** CLINTONS!!!!!!?
Excuse me while I take a moment to gnaw the leg off of my desk now...
2007-03-24 14:27:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Um...no there's also Senator Joe Biden as well. He was on the tonight show last night. Pay attention. And it's not Osama...It's OBAMA!!! And no you are not correct, president Bush has had more than enough time to f*ck up everything thank you very much.
2007-03-24 14:17:13 · answer #7 · answered by Amanda D 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Sure, why not? The only thing that could humiliate Bush more than well, being himself, would be Hillary getting elected over him. And it would happen.
Anyway, seriously do I think they should pass that bill? HECK NO. If that happens, I am moving to a different country.
2007-03-24 14:15:04 · answer #8 · answered by pinkluxe 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No we can not bend the rules of the Constitution. This would lead this country on the road to anarchy. No one wants that. Besides that if I were Bush I would run for the mountains if anyone suggested such a thing to me.
2007-03-24 14:17:23 · answer #9 · answered by grandma 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Ummmm....NO!
Besides its now time again for a
Clinton to clean up after a Bush...
Strange of how history keeps repeating
itself, eh!
2007-03-24 18:11:09 · answer #10 · answered by BUSH IS A CLOWN 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course it should, everything has gone so swell since he took office in 2001. It would require repealing the Twenty-second Amendment to the Constitution but, hey, why let a little thing like that stop you, especially if all the dems have to offer is some woman who doesn't like to bake and a Saudi renegade hiding somewhere in Pakistan.
2007-03-24 14:18:08 · answer #11 · answered by Mac 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋