Should there be a limit on how many abortions a woman has so that she takes being safe and using contraception effectively? It can't be good for anyones life to have abortion after abortion after abortion.
2007-03-24 06:51:06 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I don't know hom many women actually do have multiple abortions, though I'm sure the number is very very small. Regardless, do you want a woman who WOULD have mulitple abortions actually having to have the child and raise it, though she couldn't figure out how to prevent her unwanted preganacies inthe first place? I don't.
I know a woman who was pregnant 6 times, and each time her child was taken away from her within a year for gross neglect. That's 6 babies in the social service system. Ovbiously the first 5 didn't teach her very much-so who's to suffer?
2007-03-24 06:57:45 · answer #1 · answered by melouofs 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Abortion tends to damage the mother's internal organs, and the attaching ligaments. After number two or three, her genitourinary tract could be permanently distended from some types of procedures, whereas a suction abortion can cause hemorrhaging, internal bleeding, and even inversion of the uterus (from the suction tearing the uterine ligaments). Damage can happen the first time!
Besides, abortion is always psychologically upsetting, and usually damaging. Imagine something living inside of you. It's your own species, and it moves. Then, suddenly, it's gone...and it's YOUR FAULT! Wouldn't that be perturbing?
On top of that, abortion is outdated! It existed before the invention of condoms, hormonal birth control, cervical caps, fallopian tube clips, and everything else we have today. If some woman is too lazy/stupid to go to the nearby gas station and buy a condom, perhaps she should not be breeding in the first place. (That's just my opinion.) ;)
2007-03-24 07:25:46 · answer #2 · answered by Valerie G 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Women should be allowed no abortions. And most definitely not as a form of birth control.
2007-03-24 06:54:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
More "state-legislated" morality? This time disguised as a "medical concern?"
No, thank you. I prefer my rights as guaranteed under the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
2007-03-24 06:57:32 · answer #4 · answered by Team Chief 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i think their should be a limit because with every abortion their is 1 life is being lost. i can under stand if it is a teenage kid getting one or if it is needed to save the mother but that should be the only reason they should allow abortion in this country
2007-03-24 06:57:12 · answer #5 · answered by masta yoda 1 · 0⤊ 4⤋
yes,you can not put a limit on a legal procedure. can we put a limit on how many big macs a person eats? don't answer,i'm afraid you would just favor some new insane law limiting our legal choices
2007-03-24 07:04:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's not good for women's health to have even one abortion let alone many.
====================
2007-03-24 06:55:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
if they are going to have multiple abortions they probably should just go ahead and get their tubes tied.
2007-03-24 07:24:40 · answer #8 · answered by curious_One 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes.
Because it is none of your business.Personal choice is being responsible for the decision and the consequences.
2007-03-24 06:59:32 · answer #9 · answered by Mother 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Woman's right to snuff out life.
2007-03-24 06:53:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋