is there any need to have american soldiers in iraq if yes why if no why??? whats your opinion aboat george w bush?? will he win the election???
2007-03-24 06:49:28 · 9 answers · asked by Nijin K 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Have you ever seen two people starting a fight, and seen someone try to stop it? Get in the middle and it usually ends up with both of the original protagonists beating up on the one who tried to prevent the damage in the first place. People who split off from the original group to form their own group spend most of their time fighting with each other over very small differences in their splinter groups. That's where the Protestant Revolution came from, the French Revolution, the American Revolution, even the Civil Wars around the world all came from, and the war we fight now in Iraq. This time, however, instead of the peace keeper interference we're used to, we picked a side, and took the first punch.You cannot take back a poorly informed decision, you trusted someone you shouldn't have trusted and now you are in a mess. You cannot just stop in the middle , take you ball and go home. A responsible entity has to take responsibility for its decisions and do the best they can with want they've done and follow through to the end. Then you go the doctor and have the damage repaired or go through rehabilitation and change how you do things from now on. We are still in the middle, both protagonists are mad at us for unfounded judgments that didn't end up helping their cause.(The drunk driver has to take responsibility for the dead passenger, the bar tender is held responsible for serving to much booze, even it the drunk lied about his age. The guy in the back seat of the other car is still paralised for life. Responsibility has been applied, punishment has been determined, and the guy is still paralized!) How do you fix it?
About George, he's a politician, no one should have believed any of them. They say and do what will be best for them to get the job! You cannot get the the White House without giving away so much compromise that when you get the job,everyone spends all their time trying to get you out of the job.
2007-03-24 07:30:09 · answer #1 · answered by Diana P 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
What election is George Bush running in?
And yes, there is a valid reason to have some US forces in Iraq. As advisors, teachers, drill instructors, combat engineers. But those roles can be done by less than 1% our current forces.
There is no strong evidence I've seen that what we're doing in Iraq is actually helping anyone in the long term, and lots of evidence to support that argument we're only making things worse.
My opinion on Bush is well known, and not relevant to this.
2007-03-24 06:54:55 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
First off President Bush is not eligible for re-election. Secondly the soldiers need to stay in Iraq until their government can take over all duties that are currently being performed by American soldiers. Bush is not doing a fantastic job but all that is seen as moot in the face of all the unwarranted attacks from liberals.
2007-03-24 06:56:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
This country needs to return to the old standard of VICTORY AT ANY COST . Quitting is not how this country became a super power and backing down will put US in the same group as the losers of Europe like France and Italy. At least Great Britain can still hold her head up for sticking by their standards. Congress should demand better planning by the military that produces positive results or the Generals lose their pensions and are charged with dereliction of duty.
2007-03-24 07:31:05 · answer #4 · answered by mr conservative 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
this might purely be between the various comments in the previous something is finalized. as properly, a troop withdrawal does no longer mean we are leaving Iraq completely. we are able to nonetheless be in touch in training Iraqi troops and operations against Al Qaida. Even the Democrats approve of that. we are unlikely everywhere for some years yet to return, that i will assure you.
2016-10-20 08:32:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Bush gets his way pretty soon, he won't care about Iraq anymore, just like he's said he doesn't care about Bin Laden anymore... it will be all about Iran... Lets just pray he doesn't get his way because no one supports Iran's Ademnijhad anyways... not even Iranians.
He's just blowing a lot of smoke up everyone's butts for some other agenda.
2007-03-24 06:56:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
yes. Bush? not allowed to say.(been warned already), what election?
2007-03-24 07:03:44 · answer #7 · answered by Doctor Pain 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
where have you been hiding? Your question is unanswerable!
2007-03-24 07:04:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
What about it who f-in cares!
2007-03-24 06:51:58 · answer #9 · answered by Andrew B 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋