Confusing , but here goes. My sister and her husband just recently moved into a home. That belonged to his moms then girlfriend. They have since broken up. And now this "ex" is talking about wanting to move back into this home with a new girlfriend. The home in question is a mobile home and this person wanted them to pay $800 for it. It is a fixer upper ! They have paid half , have receipts etc. Have applied at the park for residency , had police reports ran on them etc. So that establishes them as residences at that lot number - correct ? This girl was also in contact with the office stating she no longer lived there , had interest in living there and that she was selling to my sister and her husband. Would they not be references should my sister have to battle this out in court ? Now here is the clincher. After all of this we find out this girl is not the true owner someone else is. She still owed another for it. Isn't this man the rightful owner and the only one whom can evict ?
2007-03-24
06:45:52
·
2 answers
·
asked by
Stacey N
1
in
Home & Garden
➔ Other - Home & Garden
I would think that if this girl has not fulfilled her agreement with this other man , she in essence is in breach with this owner. Not only for subletting it so to speak. But for abandonment issues as well. Not to mention the fact she has my sister in there under false pretenses. Stating she was the owner , that they would own it , and know to find out she is not the legal owner. My sister and her husband has paid half on this , and the other half was/is due this next week. They have not signed anything other than at the office where the mobile home is. They are the ones on the lease at the trailer court. Not the other girl. Now if my sister doesn't pay the other half to this girl , what can be done ? If this girl accepts money and we get a contract written up and notorized will it hold up ? We do not have the money for an attorney at this time , so is a call to local legal aid recommended ?And finally,if she can evict them , what is the time statute before they have to vacate 30 days?
2007-03-24
06:52:22 ·
update #1