...do you feel that in reality they are as harmful as the close-minded religious conservatives, as their sole intention is to spread their philosophy to as many people as possible & make money or get benefit out of such people?
2007-03-24 06:26:13 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The liberal agenda and those who propagate it are hate mongers who will bash and trash all who oppose them.
2007-03-24 06:39:34 · answer #1 · answered by Mother 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Factually, your statement is based on blind ignorance.
Factually, liberals aren't out to "convert" people like Bush's neoconservatives have been doing since he came to power in 2001.
I don't ever recall being open-minded and compassionate about a number of things, a *threat* to society.
2007-03-24 10:59:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The problem is not religious conservatives nor is it liberals. The problem is Zealots! Whether they are Christian zealots or Muslim zealots or liberal zealots or anti-war zealots or environmental zealots they all have one thing in common.
The facts don't matter, logic doesn't matter, nothing matters except forcing their views on everyone else. More and more I have seen this zealotry overtaking the democratic party.
.
2007-03-24 06:35:47 · answer #3 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Are you saying being an opinionated capitalist excludes being good-natured?
2007-03-24 06:30:43 · answer #4 · answered by Studbolt Slickrock Deux 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's good and bad on both sides.
2007-03-24 06:30:43 · answer #5 · answered by brian2412 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. I also don't believe that liberals are supposed to be "good natured" and convervatives are not. . . these are stereotypes.
2007-03-24 06:30:31 · answer #6 · answered by kobacker59 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Trust me, they aren't good natured.
2007-03-24 06:28:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yep, I agree.
2007-03-24 06:29:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋