English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

Well, maybe not for listening to the C.I.A., because he can't think for himself.

2007-03-24 06:26:31 · answer #1 · answered by St♥rmy Skye 6 · 2 1

Are you talking about some specific time he listened to them, or are you asking about wiretapping CIA offices? What point are you trying to make?

If the issue is "was the war legal?" then the answer is yes. Congress approved military force in Iraq. It doesn't matter why they did. They did. That makes the deployment legal.

If you're talking about NSA wiretapping, Bush's own lawyers stipulated in court that FISA was violated. And the federal court ruled on the issue that Bush violated 18 USC 2511 and 50 USC 180x with the warrantless wiretapping program. See the 2006 federal holding in the Eastern District of Michigan.

If you're talking about something else, then being more specific will allow people to better answer your question.

2007-03-24 13:28:53 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 3 0

If you are referring to the WMD there is no hard proof although it is clear what he told the country was indeed a lie. Now did he knowing lie during his speech or did he continue with his lie after he knew the facts. That is the question. So either he knew before hand and still lied in order to further his cause, or he gave his speech believing the facts he was given but then after learning the real facts he lied by still maintained his position. So here are the options: 1) He is a criminal (no hard facts but tons of underlying evidence), 2) He is a con man and a liar (ample evidence to support this one), or, 3) He is a buffoon and idiot who is lead around by the nose by his handlers Cheney and Rumsfeld (again volumes of evidence to support this also).

2007-03-24 14:15:57 · answer #3 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 2 0

He didn't actually listen to them. He listened to Rumsfeld and Cheney and Chalabi and Bremer, but not to the CIA, because the CIA wouldn't tell him what he wanted to hear.

They never said that it was certain that Saddamn had WMD. They never said they had samples from defectors, here's the analysis, here's where the stuff is located. they never said anything like that.

Bush would have been better off listening to what they actually said, rather than trying to read what his advisers said in the CIA's briefings.

2007-03-24 13:35:26 · answer #4 · answered by oimwoomwio 7 · 2 0

"Listening" isn't the crime.
The crime was lying to the Congress (and the rest of
the world) when he said that he KNEW there were
weapons of mass destruction when the perponderence
of evidence both from within and outside the CIA did
not state that.

That is, he selectively decided to use or discard
evidence on the basis of what he wanted to be true.

As a result of lying to us, over 60000 Iraqis and almost
3000 Americans have died - and we're talking upwards
of 20000 Americans with debilitating wounds.

2007-03-24 13:27:03 · answer #5 · answered by Elana 7 · 5 1

four minutes and no response?? Lol!

I love when they explain the crime that has no "proof" behind it. As in the poster right below. Heh!

2007-03-24 13:25:19 · answer #6 · answered by panthrchic 4 · 1 2

No one said that was a crime. That's not what hes been criticized for - show me otherwise.

You're just trolling. Nice try.

2007-03-24 13:27:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Never said he did...his crime is STAYING the course that is proven False....see?

2007-03-24 13:25:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

109TH CONGRESS
2ND SESSION
H. Res. 1106
Articles of Impeachment against George Walker Bush, President of the United States of America, and other officials, for high crimes and misdemeanors.
_____________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF
REPESENTATIVES
DECEMBER 8, 2006
Ms. McKINNEY introduced the following Resolution:
_____________________________
RESOLUTION
Resolved, that George Walker Bush, President of the United States, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors, and that the following Articles of Impeachment be exhibited to the United States Senate: Articles of Impeachment exhibited by the House of Representatives of the United States of America in the name of itself and of all the people of the United States of America, against George Walker Bush, President of the United States of America, and other officials, in maintenance and support of its impeachment against him for high crimes and misdemeanors.

Be it resolved by the House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled that:

ARTICLE I. FAILURE TO PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION

In violation of the oath of office, which reads: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,” George Walker Bush, in his conduct while President of the United States has demonstrated a pattern of abuse of office and of executive privilege, and disregard for the Constitution itself. This conduct includes the following:

Manipulating Intelligence and Lying to Justify War.
In violation of the separation of powers under the Constitution and his subsequent obligation to share intelligence with the Congress, George Walker Bush, while serving as President of the United States of America, in preparing the invasion of Iraq, did withhold intelligence from the Congress, by refusing to provide Congress with the full intelligence picture that he was being given, by redacting information by, for example, removing portions of reports such as the August 6, 2001 Presidential Daily Brief, and actively manipulating the intelligence on Iraq’s alleged weapons programs by pressuring the Central Intelligence Agency and other intelligence agencies to provide intelligence such that “the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy” as revealed in the “Downing Street Memo.”

To this end, President George Walker Bush and Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld created the Office of Special Plans inside the Pentagon to override existing intelligence reports by providing unreliable evidence that supported the claim that Iraq’s alleged weapons of mass destruction posed an imminent threat to the United States of America. By justifying the invasion of Iraq with false and misleading statements linking Iraq to the attacks of September 11, 2001, and falsely asserting that Iraq had a nuclear weapons program for which it was importing aluminum tubes and uranium, these assertions being either false, or based on “fixed” intelligence, with the intent to misinform the people and their representatives in Congress in order to gain their support for invading Iraq, denying both the people and their representatives in Congress the right to make an informed choice, George Walker Bush, President of the United States, did commit and was guilty of high crimes against the United States of America.

ARTICLE II. ABUSE OF OFFICE AND OF 3 EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE.

In violation of his oath to “faithfully execute the office of President of the United States,” George Walker Bush, in his conduct while President of the United States, has consistently demonstrated disregard for that oath by obstructing and hindering the work of Congressional investigative bodies and by seeking to expand the scope of the powers of his office. This conduct includes the following:

Failure to Uphold Accountability.
In abrogation of his responsibility under the oath of officeto take care that the Laws be faithfully executed, by which he agreed to act in good faith and accept responsibility for the overall conduct of the Executive Branch, a duty vested in his office alone under the Constitution, George Walker Bush, failed to take responsibility for, investigate or discipline those responsible for an ongoing pattern of negligence, incompetence and malfeasance to the detriment of the American people.

Those whom George Walker Bush, as President of the 23 United States of America, has failed to hold to account include but are not limited to the following top-level officials in his administration:

(a) Richard Cheney. In violation of his oath of office to support and defend the Constitution, Richard Cheney, Vice President of the United States of America, played a key role in manipulating intelligence in the interest of promoting the illegal invasion of Iraq by pressuring analysts at the Central Intelligence Agency to “fix” their intelligence estimates of the danger posed by Iraq in relation to weapons of mass destruction, whereby Richard Cheney, Vice President of the United States, did commit and was guilty of high crimes against the United States of America.

(b) Condoleezza Rice, In violation of her Constitutional duty to share and provide accurate and truthful intelligence information with the Congress, as former National Security Advisor to the President, did play a leading role in deceiving Congress and the American public by repeating and propagating false statements concerning Iraq’s alleged weapons of mass destruction program, including false information that the purchase of aluminum tubes demonstrated that Iraq was pursuing a nuclear weapons program, false information that Iraq was seeking to purchase uranium and false information that Iraq sought help in developing a chemical and biological weapons program; whereby Conoleezza Rice, Secretary of State of the United States of America, did commit and was guilty of high misdemeanors against the United States of America.

By neglecting to superintend the conduct of these officials and to hold members of the Executive Branch responsible for their negligence or violations of law, George Walker Bush, President of the United States, did commit and was guilty of high misdemeanors against the United States of America.

Wherefore, by their aforementioned conduct, George Walker Bush, Richard Cheney and Condoleezza Rice warrant impeachment, trial and removal from office.

ARTICLE III. FAILURE TO ENSURE THE LAWS ARE FAITHFULLY EXECUTED

In violation of his duty under Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution of the United States of America to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” George Walker Bush, during his tenure as President of the United States, has violated the letter and spirit of laws and rules of criminal procedure used by civilian and military courts, and has violated or ignored regulatory codes and practices that carry out the law.

This conduct includes the following:

Illegal Domestic Spying.
In violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) [50 USC Chapter 36], George Walker Bush did clandestinely direct the National Security Agency and various other intelligence agencies, in secret and outside the lawful scope of their mandates, for purposes unrelated to any lawful function of his offices, to conduct electronic surveillance of citizens of the United States on U.S. soil without seeking to obtain, before or after, a judicial warrant, thereby subverting the powers of the Congress and the Judiciary by circumventing the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) courts established by Congress, whose express purpose is to check such abuses of executive power, provoking the presiding judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to file a complaint and another judge to resign in protest, the said program having been subsequently ruled illegal (ACLU vs. NSA); he has also concealed the existence of this unlawful program of spying on American citizens from the people and all but a few of their representatives in Congress, even resorting to outright public deceit as on 20 April, 2004, when he told an audience in Buffalo, New York: “any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretap, it requires . . . a court order. Nothing has changed, by the way. When we're talking about chasing down terrorists, we're talking about getting a court order before we do so,” whereby said George Walker Bush, President of the United States, did commit and was guilty of high crimes against the United States of America.

In all of this, George Walker Bush has repeatedly and unapologetically misled the American people and has sought to undermine the system of checks and balances established by the Founding Founders. Wherefore George Walker Bush, by such conduct, and in the interest of saving our Constitution and our democracy from the threat of arbitrary government, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office.

2007-03-24 13:26:33 · answer #9 · answered by Renegade_X 3 · 5 3

fedest.com, questions and answers