Was this a direct attack on Obama from Bill Clinton?

Question

http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20070323/cm_thenation/45178500_1

I would think Bill Clinton out of ANYONE should be careful on his comments about the Iraq war and his wife's vote in 2002 for the war. After all he created Chalibi and Sadaam and knew there weren’t any WMDs when Mrs. Bill Clinton voted in 2002.

Is this another way of them trying to defend their mis-step with the middle east crisis while Bill was getting his infamous wack job?

Answer 1

The Clintons will do everything possible to undermine Obama, but they will also do everything possible to make everyone think this doesn't come directly from them.

Answer 2

While avoiding any direct criticism of Obama's statements, Clinton said it was "ludicrous" to treat "Hillary and Obama's positions on the war as polar opposites." Then he tried to fact-check the netroots: "This dichotomy that's been set up to allow [Obama] to become the raging hero of the anti-war crowd on the Internet is just factually inaccurate."

I'd call that a direct attack. The Clintons are dangerous. I'm surprised Americans have been duped by them, but I guess that's to be expected given our pathetic Public School system.

Answer 3

You forget this is the USA, people have short memories.
It wasn't a wack job it was a hum job...And OJ and Micheal Jackson are innocent...

Answer 4

The Clintons are not as dangerous as people think... there popularity is decreasing... see!!!!
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/Political%20Tracking/Democratic%20Primaries/DemocraticPresidentialPrimary.htm