I don't get it.
I don't like them THAT much, but, I mean, how is their 1st full- length, take this to your grave controversial??
I can see how cork-tree is, but how infinity on high is also controversial illudes me [[ugh. hate that album, they've turned into such posers!]]
2007-03-24 04:50:42 · 12 answers · asked by ♥ peace out ♥ 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
Ok, fine, when I say posers, i dont really mean posers of anyone else. I mean they are posing to be what they used to be [[awesome]], even when they are not anymore. God, all this publicity has made them try to appeal to everyone. That's not why their fans liked them!! We USED to like them because they did just play their music, now they are changing their genres all around.
Thats ok, i guess, if it's what they want to do, but I really don't feel like it's "them". There is no longer that emotion in patrick's voice, which is why i used to love them!!
2007-03-24 04:59:04 · update #1
If by controversial, you mean that people don't like them, it's because they are emo. Emo only appeals to teenage girls and guys that act like teenage girls.
And to the girl above me, if people left them alone, they wouldn't have anything to sing about. They like the attention of not being liked.
2007-03-24 04:55:52 · answer #1 · answered by nemostorm512 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Just because a band labels themselves "controversial", a controversial band that does not make. This group really is not anymore talented than the next 60 second band out there. They have not "turned into posers", you're just seeing the light that they are, in fact, posers.
2007-03-24 11:56:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
They're not controversial!
They are made like that because of 394223423423423404 fall out boy haters!!!!
If people just left them alone and let them play their music, in peace, then we wouldn't have a problem!
POSERS???? who the hell do you think they are posing off of? Back up your claims with some info.
2007-03-24 11:55:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I didn't know that they were controversial, but I always knew that they were posers. I mean, come on,name your band after some crap from The Simpsons.
2007-03-24 11:57:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i've never heard of them as being controversial.
they just suck.
and yes, i agree, they are just a bunch of posers
2007-03-24 11:59:28 · answer #5 · answered by ... 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They're controversial? I've really never heard anything about that.
2007-03-24 11:53:31 · answer #6 · answered by McLovin 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
must be why i dont listen to that garbage..it dont even sound like singing
the only song by em that i like is "sugar we're goin down"
2007-03-24 11:54:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
cuz noone can belive how much talk there is about a band that is so freaking awful
2007-03-25 00:55:42 · answer #8 · answered by cav 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because these posuer tweens back them up so much and are willing to fight to the death for them
2007-03-24 11:54:20 · answer #9 · answered by applecore 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
no they rnt! harold can b controversial. fob is not!
2007-03-24 11:54:17 · answer #10 · answered by GDCBGB 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋