English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

yes...i hate him!!!
he can kiss my ***!!!
he sent my uncle to afghan!!!

xoxo

2007-03-24 03:57:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Depends on how you look at it.
The sensible thing in dealing with 9/11 would have been to invade Afghanistan. Take the place over then pump money into the country to make it the jewel of that part of the world.
Rather than invade Iraq, a lot of political pressure should have been applied to the entire Muslim world to get them to clean up this radical Muslim mess in the middle east.
We could have done things like start pumping oil out of the ground in the USA in protected lands, dump a few billion dollars in alternate energy research, all to make a point that the oil in the middle east might just become worthless.
Maybe then to protect "their" interest, the Arab world might have rounded up all the terrorists and eliminate the threat.
But that approach wouldn't have earned a red cent for all the defense contractors in the USA. The way it was actually done 1/2 a trillion dollars has been pumped into American businesses just in Iraqi contracts. Add to that the money made by companies that supply security equipment and staff to airports and the tens of thousands of additional Homeland Security personnel added to the payroll.
Did he go over the top? You tell me.

2007-03-24 04:42:53 · answer #2 · answered by Overt Operative 6 · 2 0

If anything, Mr Bush has not done a good enough job of alerting Americans to the lethal - and imminent - threat of IslamaFacist terrorism.
It is frightening just how innattentive and unaware we as Americans are.
Our congress fiddles with irrelevant show-trials to embarrass a president rather than deal with the very real issues we face, idiot celebrities endorse the lunacy of our enemies by participating in the most outlandish anti-American propoganda, the media continues to portray our noble efforts as misguided and ill-concieved...why? Because they loathe the political persuasion of the man at the top.
WAKE UP America - we are weak, we are vulnerable and we are going to pay a VERY heavy price for our non-chalance about this lurking danger.
Put aside your irrational hatred for Bush, and try - just for a minute - to love your country .
We must protect ourselves.

2007-03-24 04:14:17 · answer #3 · answered by Garrett S 3 · 1 1

No- Wearing the US Armed Services to the point of exhaustion, and diverting the best terrorist fighters in the world, the US special forces from the hunt for terrorists so that Dick Cheney and his oil buddies can regain access to Iraqi crude oil is not going over the top on terrorism. It is the opposite of that.

2007-03-24 04:06:07 · answer #4 · answered by Coach 3 · 0 1

The US is a paradox... on the one hand it is the most generous, giving, uniting force on the planet. My people have received much needed food and supplies from the American people for decades, and continues to. We are grateful and feeling deeply indebted. Many Americans invest too much time dogging their own country, running it down, damaging it's image as they rant and rave about how horrible it is, never recognizing its' greatness. By the same token, few of those who complain have ever really experienced the hardships others have around the world-- the whining has become the shallow poor me, entitlement value system of much of its' citizenry.

On the other hand, most of the world sees Bush and the US as the greatest threat to world peace today. Having lived in several countries and been exposed to American pressures in my country, I've seen 1st hand what American policies designed to help can do. The US, over the last 75 years, has infiltrated, attacked, toppled and attempted to assassinate leaders and other world governments, more times than all other countries combined. The English follow a close second.

So, Americans are over the top in some realms and extremely giving and generous on the other- a classic dichotomy befitting a country with a sort of bipolar disorder!

2007-03-24 04:00:13 · answer #5 · answered by Wisdom??? 5 · 1 3

Over the top, down the street, and out into the stratosphere. The kooks who think terrorism is some great battle of our time or that this justifies all sorts of crimes against the world need more prozac and some rest time in a rubber room.

2007-03-24 04:19:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Yes, He is certainly going on the TOP.

2007-03-24 03:59:37 · answer #7 · answered by KRISHNA 1 · 1 0

NO! Would he be going not far enough if one of the Rag Heads showed up on your door-step???

I take that back. With your name ,might be a bunch of them there already.

2007-03-24 03:59:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

There isn't any such thing as going too far against the terrorists . We should be coming at em at every angle, every day, every night, everywhere !!!

2007-03-24 03:58:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Plainly and simply YES.

2007-03-24 10:39:48 · answer #10 · answered by breedgemh_101 5 · 1 0

there is "no" going over the top with terrorism! We will not take their crap............

2007-03-24 04:21:26 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers