Should i veto this resolution regarding the expansion of the role and contribution of women in the United Nations field-based operations, including at the decision-making level, and especially among military observers and civilian police?
2007-03-24 03:52:14 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
i also must assume the role of my actual country, in this case Russia, so what would they do?
2007-03-24 15:46:33 · update #1
no do not veto it, stay in and play out politics of it, veto is too easy and a cop out not a smart political move, it takes no brains to veto, it takes brains to compromise
2007-03-24 04:53:34 · answer #1 · answered by jdschumanrk 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The 5 everlasting contributors of the Security Council (China, France, Russia, United Kingdom, and United States) benefit from the privilege of veto vigor. This vigor has been intensely debatable seeing that the drafting of the UN Charter in 1945. The United States and Russia might more often than not no longer have accredited the construction of the United Nations with out the veto privilege. Fifty years later, the controversy at the life and use of the veto maintains, reinvigorated by way of many circumstances of veto-chance as good as genuine veto use. This web page follows the dilemma, and supplies knowledge and a complete record of all of the vetoes forged and the themes vetoed within the Security Council seeing that 1945.
2016-09-05 14:19:15 · answer #2 · answered by puzo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"mock UN" that's funny.
2007-03-24 03:58:16 · answer #3 · answered by freemanbac 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋