The meaning of life is LIFE itself, you have NO desire to procreate, this is anti-life. Is this Natural? Does nature want your DNA taken out of the gene pool? Maybe so, But the FACT remains that the physical act of homosexuality is a CHOICE, not because you were born that way.
2007-03-24 03:50:00 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
Im not saying being gay is bad, just acting the part is
2007-03-24 03:56:23 · update #1
I can see how you would get mad at the facts
2007-03-24 04:00:46 · update #2
If you know nothing, nothing really is the best thing to say.
I'm not saying being a knob-head is bad, just acting the part is.
Run along and play now.
.
2007-03-24 03:59:40 · answer #1 · answered by abetterfate 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Completely wrong.
Only people like you who have no understanding of how things in Nature actually work would believe such foolishness.
There are many examples in nature of non-breeding individuals that work and provide service to the community as a whole, in some cases that society could not function at all without those individuals, in others society functions better with those individuals.
Foolish one, go study, your actual education is far from complete.
Actually as far as your final little bit of superfluous commentary, homosexuality is not simply a physical act just as heterosexuality is not. A person can go their entire life celibate but still be attracted to the same or opposite sex. That attraction is NOT a choice, it is innate.
You state no "facts", only bigoted opinions. Your opinions don't hold enough relevance to cause anger.
2007-03-24 04:10:14 · answer #2 · answered by IndyT- For Da Ben Dan 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Of course the physical act of homosexuality is a choice, so is the physical act of heterosexuality. When people are describing the term choice, they mean that someone chooses their sexual orientation. That's absurd. No one can choose their sexual orientation. As for procreation, how is not choosing to procreate anti-life? There are many straight couples that choose not to have children; that doesn't mean that they are anti-life. Abortions are anti-life. Get a clue.
2007-03-24 13:34:38 · answer #3 · answered by Hmmm... 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I beg to differ on you statement about being gay as a choice. This does not make me anti-life. People have said that being gay is a choice, not being born this way. If I had the choice, I would have chosen an easier lifestyle. I am not a gluten for punishment, yet that is what our lifestyles suffer through. I wouldn't wish my lifestyle on anyone...no one deserves to be treated as a second class citizen.
2007-03-24 11:13:51 · answer #4 · answered by S.F. Girl 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Thanks for joining the fight against LGBT, hatred and prejudice!
Yes, you are right, people who are gay tend to have fewer offspring than straight people, thereby helping to reduce the overpopulation of the world. There are also straight couples that choose not not have children and we celebrate their decision. Sadly, some people want to have kids and can not. Isn't it great the option to adopt is there?
OF course I agree that the world is overpopulated and that the crowding will become a major issue if we don't take action. I am pleased to discover people, such as yourself, who can commit to helping the whole world with a small sacrifice by making the choice to not have children.
Which PFLAG chapter do you belong to?
2007-03-24 04:34:03 · answer #5 · answered by E_Tard 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Even the ultra conservative president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary has said that scientific research "points to some level of biological causation" for homosexuality & "I am absolutely confident that a large number of homosexuals are telling the truth when they say they did not choose that orientation."
Gay people are born gay.
An October 2004 scientific research publication stated that scientists at the University of Padua have found that women tend to have more children when they inherit the same genetic factors linked to homosexuality in men. This fertility boost more than compensates for the lack of offspring fathered by gay men, and keeps the “gay” genetic factors in circulation. Mothers of gay men produced an average of 2.7 babies compared with 2.3 born to mothers of straight men. And maternal aunts of gay men had 2.0 babies compared with 1.5 born to the maternal aunts of straight men.
A January 2007 report suggested to be gay you need to receive one gay gene from both parents, and that those with only one gay gene have a selective advantage because they are heterosexual but have increased style, male sex drive, charm and seductiveness towards women.
Since these studies show increased fertility for mothers having a gay child and a selective advantage for those carrying partial gay genetic factors, it appears that gay people promote life.
2007-03-24 05:30:57 · answer #6 · answered by χριστοφορος ▽ 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Lots of people have no desire to procreate. Are you this upset over birth control? Birth control isn't natural and takes DNA out of the gene pool. Personally, I don't care if they are born that way OR if it's a choice. If it's a choice, it's THEIR choice to make, not yours.
2007-03-24 03:54:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
I'd suggest you think twice before opening your mouth and allowing yourself to shove your foot in it.
More and more gay/lesbian couples are having and raising children.
My own son will be graduating high school this spring and going on to college...and he's my 100% natural and biological child.
What needs to be taken out of the gene pool is ignorance, hate, intolerance and bigotry.
2007-03-24 04:58:20 · answer #8 · answered by DEATH 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Gosh - maybe it's because they don't know the differences between SPECIES and RACE!?!?!?!?!?!? They are just not too bright. Like you!
Okay - no - seriously. Just FYI - Gay men use their sperm to create life ALL THE TIME! And lesbians use their eggs. There are a lot of biological children of gay parents in the world.
And - based on your questions and answers that I've seen on here - most of those children - regardless of their ages - are more loving, smarter - and happier than you!
2007-03-24 04:35:15 · answer #9 · answered by liddabet 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think we should also exterminate straight people who don't have children by age 13 or so....
How come you know so much about choices? Did you have to choose to be straight? I guess so---from your quesion.You must have tried homosexuality a lot to form such an opinion on choice. Too bad you failed the test.
2007-03-24 05:14:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not everyone is able to procreate, such as those who were born infertile, so obviously the purpose of life is not to make more. The only thing that everyone does it die, so is that the point of life? Of course not, stop generalizing and realize that being happy not only for yourself but for others will make your life better and more enjoyable, everyone wants to be happy, so perhaps that is the point of life and maybe you should strive to help everyone be happy.
2007-03-24 04:07:27 · answer #11 · answered by elvishbard 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋