English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

Good question. The answer is because quantum mechanics, like everything else devised by man is an evolving structure. The more man comes to know the more man has to tweak what was previously thought to be valid.

For instance, there exists no ultimate sub-atomic particle as yet identified by man, and because of that it is presumptuous and the height of ignorance to presume that quantum mechanics is valid in context with unknown variables.

So when one states "sub-atomic," it is only in context with what is known at present. That quantum mechanics fits what is known by no means is an indicator that it is an absolute valid system.

In fact, I would defy anyone to tell you what is the ultimate indivisible sub-atomic particle.

You are correct to question, cause man is a posturing ape.

Mostly, there comes along once every hundred years or so a genius. Then he is gone leaving followers to carry on the torch. The followers will never accomplish anything in furtherance.

Lastly there has occurred revisions in physics based upon observations in the sub-atomic realm. Revision means the mathematics were wrong. Good day.

2007-03-24 04:06:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I don't understand the question. Quantum mechanics DO work at the subatomic level. It's classical mechanics, developed by Newton, that don't work at the subatomic level, b/c Newton didn't consider how objects at extremes of the mass and energy spectrum behave. He placed no limits to the speed, for example, of objects; he only based his theories (which were correct) at the macroscopic level, when he was observing nature and planets. Because he didn't consider an extreme of the spectrum, his theories weren't complete, or didn't encompass a complete view of the universe.

2007-03-24 10:17:02 · answer #2 · answered by J Z 4 · 1 0

Quantum mechanics ONLY works at the subatomic level. Try learning at least how to ask an intelligent question, or you wind up looking ignorant and unworthy of an answer.

2007-03-24 10:15:16 · answer #3 · answered by thylawyer 7 · 2 0

Huh ? That's where it works the best!

2007-03-24 10:38:47 · answer #4 · answered by Gene 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers