The reason why I ask is that I have not heard Paul Gadd's (aka Gary Glitter's) tunes played for years - okay, it's argued that Jackson shone for three decades and created good times for many...and more importantly, was found not guilty for his various charges, but that's never stopped us in the western world from 'nudge nudge/wink wink' stories (and believing such stories). And before one has a pop at Glitter's tunes, in the short period in the early seventies, he was just as popular as Bowie and Marc Bolan. For those who have forgot - or don't know...Mr. Gadd was arrested (and jailed) in Vietnam for sex acts against children in 2005.
2007-03-24 01:52:16 · 12 answers · asked by nativexile 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
It seems that Glitter has been literally wiped out of pop history. I recall watching a TV programme about glam rock and the 70s and he wasn't featured or even mentioned even though he WAS glam rock personified. I don't know if you could still buy his stuff but I never see it in the shops perhaps they refuse to stock it. I don't like what he's done with kids etc but you can't just blot somebody out of the history books.
2007-03-24 05:09:57 · answer #1 · answered by georgeygirl 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Had he been stumbled directly to blame and there replaced into *unquestionably* not undemanding evidence of this guilt - I advise, and not using a shadow of a doubt, particular i might seem at him in yet in a diverse way. i might in all possibility end listening to his too... those costs are actually not some thing I take gently. i like Michael, yet while there replaced into an undoctored video or some thing to that impression that replaced into hardcore evidence, i does not proceed to assist him. Had he been stumbled directly to blame yet there wasn't particularly sufficient evidence, then i could be hella p!ssed on the yank justice device. i might probaby be going around with a 'unfastened Michael' sign or some thing - i can not even entertain the considered Michael in penitentiary if he replaced into unjustly incarcerated. it would be terrible.
2016-10-19 12:18:17 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I have heard a lot less of Michael Jackson's music on the radio, but they still play it. Also, MJ turned out not guilty. Although a lot of people still think he is guilty.
2007-03-24 09:23:45 · answer #3 · answered by Jennifer 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The diffrence is jacko's got the money for thee best legal team and he had enough dosh to pay off that wee guy a few year ago he even admitted to having kids in his kip so money talks glitter got caught with kiddy porn on his pc so he was caught red handed then done his 6 month or whatever what it was, got out and he's pissed off so he can be out of the public eye and do his evil things.I hope all perverts rot in hell.
2007-03-24 02:07:24 · answer #4 · answered by gary r 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Michael Jackson's music would have still been played as he has many fans that would have stood by him and besides Michael is a legend
2007-03-24 10:14:37 · answer #5 · answered by Gemini 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sorry... I still have my suspicions about him. He is just weird. Little boys in his bed etc... Changing his features from a good looking man to a hideous monster, forgive me but he ain't a full shilling & I wouldn't trust him as far as I could ever throw him. xxx
2007-03-24 10:18:12 · answer #6 · answered by Joanne W 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would like to think, what you suggest would happen, but I doubt it. The thing with paul gadd is his music was not on much, when he committed his offence, well not as much as the other one anyway.
2007-03-24 02:14:01 · answer #7 · answered by madge 51 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No because it is rubish about him but all too true about Glitter ,I used to love Glitter as well.
2007-03-24 01:57:12 · answer #8 · answered by pups 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think they would still play his music but Michael Jackson is innocent and they never could have convicted him without even a shred of evidence!
♥♥We Love You Michael!!!!♥♥
2007-03-24 02:40:01 · answer #9 · answered by ♥Stranger In Maine™♥ (Thriller) 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
we'll never know because no matter what sccusations get thrown by him, he always seems to get off the hook- with so much evidence against him too.
i will listen to his music because i think when he was black- he looked better on films and sounds better. after he got let off, i think its wrong expecially when he was found with porn and drugs. so no, he isnt making money from me to try get himself back on trak.
i wont be buying anymore of his music
2007-03-24 01:58:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋