English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Surely he should have known better. I know if I had the wealth he has, I would protect it no matter how much in love I was by getting any future husband to sign a pre-nup, thats what they are there for, isn't it?

2007-03-24 01:08:17 · 15 answers · asked by missieclass 4 in Entertainment & Music Celebrities

15 answers

well I agree

Even though he was showing true faith in love

I don't think it had anything to do with him being naive at all

plain facts When your wealthy like Sir Paul

one should protect his wealth

with legal documentation
of some sort
So with all his business sense he made some wrong choices

Some times following your Heart isn't always the way to go especially withthat amount of money

2007-03-24 01:20:12 · answer #1 · answered by Wowwie 3 · 1 0

I think when you have more money than your prospective partner, then it's time to think about a pre-nup. Most marriages end in divorce, so you can never be too careful

2007-03-24 01:12:13 · answer #2 · answered by sonia h 1 · 0 0

he was a bit misguided, but at the time they both thought the marriage would last forever, hence they thought no need for a pre nup. but then again, apparently he is so rich that even if she got half of everything i'm sure he wouldn't starve to death.

2007-03-24 01:12:00 · answer #3 · answered by sirdunny 4 · 0 0

a pre nup is a script for failure, it seems to be statement of distrust, i think some people fail to use it in the same way many people dont want toface writing a will cos it might be seen as tempting fate!

2007-03-24 01:23:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Well he thought it would last till death, like his marriage to Linda did, if only he listened to his Daughters, what they said right from the start has come true. I feel so very sorry for Paul, It`s not his fault he loved the &%$£ is it, He is not the first and wo`nt be the last to be PROFESSIONALLY done over.

2007-03-24 02:20:08 · answer #5 · answered by madge 51 6 · 1 0

Possibly but I think they were genuinely in love at the time and you don't think that the person you love would ever treat you wrongly. Paul also was probably influenced by his marriage to Linda where nothing like this would have happened.He thought that all women were ladies.

2007-03-24 01:13:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

There's so much controversy about this. Yes, it was Paul's choice. We all make poor choices sometimes. I'm sure when most people get married, they think it'll last forever, but you gotta protect yourself too. You're right. He should have known better.

2007-03-24 01:33:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Do you have any idea how much money that man makes a DAY?
He has all those royalties coming in daily.....he signs something and it brings him MILLIONS....he is worth billions...what he is giving Heather is like $100 to him.
He has so much money he is not even worried.

2007-03-24 01:48:44 · answer #8 · answered by Bobbie4u 5 · 0 0

When he was younger he sang "Money can't buy me love"...then when he got older...he thinks differently...his lawyers should've straight-jacketed him...from now on his kids should keep him on a short leash if they ever want to see any of their inheritance...And having a baby at 64 should be against the law!!

2007-03-24 01:27:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes, it's his fault. Now neither of them has a leg to stand on.

2007-03-24 01:11:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers