That is, destroyed deliberately. Such projects take months of advance planning. How could he manage the demolition in few hours, in a warzone where no engineer or worker would work??? That is a proof that it was a cover up involving the US government.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329
2007-03-24 00:52:27 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Part of the reason for the proliferation of the conspiracy theories is that the NIST’s statements have been so consistently vague that it is obvious that they haven’t a clue as to what caused WTC 7 to collapse. I’ve been especially interested because I used to work in that building. What Silverstein meant by “just pull it” is a matter of pure speculation. Whatever he meant, he apparently wasn’t trying to hide it.
2007-03-24 01:54:21 · answer #1 · answered by tribeca_belle 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The statement to pull the building was made by the fire chief in regard to his fireman inside the building. Common language used by people that work in public safety. Pull the building means pull out the rescue workers, not pull the building down. Learn something, read a book, talk to a public safety person, don't get your info from a site designed for teens to chat. As you said it would take months of planning, demolition charges set, Steel cables run from key structural points to the middle of building. All this while people were working there? Those buildings had people working 24/7. If they could place the demolitions for an implosion inside without being seen, they would make a ninja look inept.
2007-03-24 01:03:34 · answer #2 · answered by mark g 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Your assertion is ridiculous. Demolition experts can bring down a building in a short amount of time. The decision was made to destroy the building because it could not be repaired and it was too dangerous to leave it up. There is nothing to tie this incident to a cover up. You are paranoid.
2007-03-24 01:03:29 · answer #3 · answered by la buena bruja 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Silverstein's Quote:
"I remember getting a call from the Fire Department commander, telling me they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, you know, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is just pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse."
-Fact which is undisputed by either side, he was talking to the fire commander
-Fact which is undisputed by either side, both are not in the demolition business
Silverstein's spokesperson, Mr. McQuillan, later clarified:
"In the afternoon of September 11, Mr. Silverstein spoke to the Fire Department Commander on site at Seven World Trade Center. The Commander told Mr. Silverstein that there were several firefighters in the building working to contain the fires. Mr. Silverstein expressed his view that the most important thing was to protect the safety of those firefighters, including, if necessary, to have them withdraw from the building."
He could be lying, right? But here is the corroborating evidence...
"They told us to get out of there because they were worried about 7 World Trade Center, which is right behind it, coming down. We were up on the upper floors of the Verizon building looking at it. You could just see the whole bottom corner of the building was gone. We could look right out over to where the Trade Centers were because we were that high up. Looking over the smaller buildings. I just remember it was tremendous, tremendous fires going on. Finally they pulled us out. They said all right, get out of that building because that 7, they were really worried about. They pulled us out of there and then they regrouped everybody on Vesey Street, between the water and West Street. They put everybody back in there. Finally it did come down. From there - this is much later on in the day, because every day we were so worried about that building we didn't really want to get people close. They were trying to limit the amount of people that were in there. Finally it did come down." - Richard Banaciski
2007-03-24 01:05:24 · answer #4 · answered by ThorGirl 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You should have watched the video clip, then you would see there was proof there was no "cover-up", according to the link you posted.
2007-03-24 01:05:49 · answer #5 · answered by RUSH MAKES OBAMA CRY !! A LOT !! 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Boy, you and I got completely different messages from that short video clip.
2007-03-24 01:01:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋