where is the berry crusher in pokemon emerald?the woman in slateport says that it's in the direct corner.?

Question

i cant find the berry crusher in pokemon emerald .where is it?i went into the direct corner room in the pokemon center with my friend but there was no berry crusher.please tell me where is it.i'll rate as best answer the one who tells me correctly.

Answer 1

You need the wireless adaptor to use the berry crusher. Providing both of you have Powder jars, you can use it. Go up to the direct counter and, the option berry crush should be availible from the menu. Once everyone's ready, you can use the berry crusher. Remember that you need one wireless adaptor for each person involved. Only Fire Red, Leaf Green and Emerald versions of the game have the berry crusher.

Answer 2

This Site Might Help You.

RE:
where is the berry crusher in pokemon emerald?the woman in slateport says that it's in the direct corner.?
i cant find the berry crusher in pokemon emerald .where is it?i went into the direct corner room in the pokemon center with my friend but there was no berry crusher.please tell me where is it.i'll rate as best answer the one who tells me correctly.

Answer 3

For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/avDja

At the very least there is no denying that oppression is gender related. It is not perpetuated by some all powerful ruling clique. It is naturalised and bread into everday activity. Men were probably more likely to oppress women than women oppressing women.This is why they made up two thirds of the antifeminist grouping. As are planters that dont directly enslave colonist responsible for the oppression they fuel by their everyday lifesyles. The everyday reproduction of masculinity is sexist. When women went to work men sexually harrassed them. When men were homosexual men battered them. When men look for custody of their children men and women think that they wont be as good as the mother. Gender oppression of course worked against women more than it did men and men were more complicity in the oppresion of women than t'other way around. Men,even if not of their own accord(?), ruled discourse and parliaments in society.They controlled what was written about the genders. Women were portrayed in discourse as weak, as the seducer as eve. Importantly housework was undervalued to labour outside the home. It still had value though. The loss of value of housework is one of the reasons that feminist started in middle class homes were the work was too dirty for the middle class women to do(AND AS RESULT HIRED MAIDS EDIT).So they began to write about women not being allowed function outside these unsaviory prisons. It was a direct result of the masculinist self valorising discourse that women rebelled against it. Of course mens policing of gender doesnt just affect women it affects other men as well and it is mostly men who enforce the rules against men - they outlawed the unmasculine activities of gay men, ridiculed transgenderism. Also the status of the parliaments as led by men doesnt change the fact that women were debating and protesting to change mens minds about the way women are built. and was only in the age of reason that women managed to do this. Men are more complicit in policing gender than women so the most by partially blamed for the oppression of women and of course some men. Finally there are some rules made by the state that the system just doesnt benifit from they are purely just to court male votes. S Such as the legalisation of rape.