India needed a fifth bowler, but didn't use Pathan in any of the games. Would he have made a difference, rather than using Ganguly and Sachin to fill in the gaps, even though they took wickets?
2007-03-23 22:57:50 · 8 answers · asked by rt10 3 in Sports ➔ Cricket
well its tough to say coz Irfan is someone who u cant predict. one day he'll bowl exceedingly well but the next he'll b all over the place. but if they were to play him who will they drop? so i guess they played the right side but they didnt perform as well as they were expected to.
2007-03-23 23:02:44 · answer #1 · answered by manofseries 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One cannot say its a mistake cos the team wasn't bad but just that its more about Ad's and cookies rather than cricket. So I think even if Pathan or Sreesanth was included it wouldn't have been much difference
2007-03-24 01:02:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They should have played Sreesanth instead of Munaf and Irfan Pathan instead of Zaheer Khan or Agarkar. And taking Harbhajan was not a good decision. He is a laddu bowler.
2007-03-23 23:18:02 · answer #3 · answered by nmkhan 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
mayb u r right..v shud hv playd Pathan..
but the Q is who wud he replace??...
but yestrday our bowling was reasonable..it was the batting that let us down..
but pathan cud hv hit a few 4s nd 6s...but nothing sure..
at such a stage one mistake cud cost u heavily/...
like it has
2007-03-23 23:18:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
ya you r correct like this match pathan is good bow as well as batting
2007-03-23 23:03:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yup ! u r right ..
v cud hv given him a chance. .. v all knew he wud help us out whnever v need him :)
itx jst dat .. .chappelx over confidence .. n not hvin faith in his matex.. ;)
2007-03-26 20:03:35 · answer #6 · answered by *! ÐHÄRINI - † !*: 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
oh my god, that match was terrible, i left after the 6th wicket, they just aint concentrating
2007-03-24 06:13:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
very big mistake
2007-03-23 23:41:28 · answer #8 · answered by john 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋