Will terrorism go on forever?

Answer 1

As long as there are people who think differently than you, yes. Sad, isn't it?

Answer 2

Unfortunately, yes. As long as there is an earth with people populating it. (*That* may not be forever though) Terrorism isn't some new thing that was just invented within the last century. It's been with us for thousands of years. And will continue for thousands of years into the future. As long as you have people who believe in a particular cause so strongly that human life becomes of little concern to them, you will always have terrorists.

Answer 3

It Can & cannot,
I Mean like If The The terrorists Decide to hang their boots IN Terrorising People,then maybe,Terrorists Have certian Demands, If U fulfill them ,then terrorism stops
Eg.(The maoists In Nepal)!

Answer 4

no . i hope.
cos the main reasons of terrorism now a days are religion, developement, domination, suppression and personal gains
if u take religion some nations are supporting some religon and suppressing other nations. they taking advantage of scince and their supeiority. suppose if u take americas restrictions on some countries like iraq and iran and some other african countries. this is the main reason behing attcks on america.
it may look like terrorism for some countries but it will be a fight it will be a war for those who doing these attacks.
another reason for this terrorism is occupation and suppression by some countries and other countirs, like israil's domination over palesine and occupation of palestine areas. this the main reason behind the emerging of hamas a terrorist goup of palestine.
another terrorism ( above reasons or above situations are not terrorist acts....i think), this is a real face of terrorism , ill say this is as real terrorism, doing brutal acts and killing thousands of people for personal gains, to show existence, and to show superiority. america and some other countries are doing these terrorist acts on countries like iraq, every one should condemn this terrorist acts.
it may be not look like terrorism for us and other countries but for iraq people its a terrorist act on them.

so we cant define and describe wat is terrorism.
its thing needed for survive, to show domination, to get advantage from other people, to show that they are best.

there is no end for this fight , (sorry) for this terrorism.

Answer 5

I hope not!

Of course, the current world focus on this doesn't help, as it just gives the terrorists more power.

Answer 6

YA MAY BE-
terrorism is something like a repetitive effort to break-up people ..........
HOPE U JOIN HANDS AGAINST IT........

Answer 7

those who love to make the big power plays would hope to
but no it wont
it was a beat up to begin with

Answer 8

Yes.

Answer 9

Definitely. Illegal things & crimes have very short lives. People do not support wrong things.

Answer 10

Forever? Well, at least Iran is in a heap of trouble now.....

Iran is dealing with two issues. First, Iran has captured 15 British sailors. Second, Iran has refused to cooperate with the U.N. regarding cessation of uranium enrichment.

Military confrontation may be on the horizon.
http://www.debka.com/headline.php?hid=3961
In addition to the British naval vessels at the Diego Garcia atoll in the Indian ocean, there is a multi-national force in the Persian Gulf. The British HMS Cornwall aircraft carrier strike group, the American aircraft carrier strike group Bremerton-based aircraft carrier CVN-74 John C. Stennis, the American aircraft carrier strike group USS Dwight D. Eisenhower and the French nuclear carrier Charles de Gaulle and its task force are all in close appoximation in the Persian Gulf. The USS Nimitz may also be in the Persian Gulf as it was scheduled for its WESTPAC07 deployment to replace the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/agency/navy/batgru-68.htm

More details about military options can be found here:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/iran-strikes.htm

Iran has elicited "confessions" from the 15 British sailors they captured and may put them on trial for espionage. The penalty for espionage in Iran is death.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article1563877.ece
“If it is proven that they deliberately entered Iranian territory, they will be charged with espionage. If that is proven, they can expect a very serious penalty since according to Iranian law, espionage is one of the most serious offences.” Espionage carries a death sentence.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6493391.stm
Iran's detention of 15 Royal Navy personnel is "unjustified and wrong", Prime Minister Tony Blair has said. UK officials are waiting to be granted access to the HMS Cornwall staff, who were seized on Friday, and have not been told where the group are held.

"It simply is not true that they went into Iranian territorial waters and I hope the Iranian government understands how fundamental an issue this is for us," Mr Blair said.

"We have certainly sent the message back to them very clearly indeed. They should not be under any doubt at all about how seriously we regard this act, which is unjustified and wrong."

On March 23, 2007, U.S. and British officials said a boarding party from the frigate HMS Cornwall was seized about during a routine inspection of a merchant ship inside Iraqi territorial waters near the disputed Shatt al-Arab waterway.

The seizure of two Royal Navy inflatable boats took place just outside the mouth of the Shatt al-Arab waterway, a 125-mile channel dividing Iraq from Iran. Its name means Arab Coastline in Arabic, and Iranians call it Arvandrud - Persian for Arvand River. A 1975 treaty recognized the middle of the waterway as the border.

Iranians send arms to Iraqi extremists, including sophisticated roadside bombs. This week, two commanders of an Iraqi Shiite militia told The Associated Press in Baghdad that hundreds of Iraqi Shiites had crossed into Iran for training by the elite Quds force, a branch of Iran's Revolutionary Guard thought to have trained Hezbollah guerrillas in Lebanon.

Regarding enrichment of uranium, Iranian President Mahmaoud Ahmadinejad abruptly cancelled his appearance before the U.N. security council and in his stead, Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki Iran spoke. He indicated that Iran was willing to continue negotiations but without the precondition that uranium enrichment must be halted.

Mottaki said, "the world has two options to proceed on the nuclear issue: continued negotiations or confrontation. Choosing the path of confrontation ... will have its own consequences. "
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070325/D8O3E7J00.html

The U.N. security council unanimously voted to expand sanctions on March 24, 2007.

The new resolution 1747 calls on Iran to comply fully with all previous UN resolutions and join negotiations to reach agreement so as to restore international confidence in the peaceful nature of its nuclear program. Full transparency and cooperation with the IAEA are required. Suspension of Iran’s banned nuclear activities will elicit the parallel suspension of sanctions. The package of incentives offered Tehran last year for its cooperation remains on the table.

The full text of the draft of resolution 1747 appears at this website:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6455853.stm
.
.