English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-23 22:35:50 · 8 answers · asked by Mr N 5 in Sports Wrestling

8 answers

WWE has ALWAYS been better than TNA ...

2007-03-23 22:38:18 · answer #1 · answered by Triple H 5 · 2 1

Honestly I didn't even know about TNA till less than 2 years ago, but I could not have been happier when I found out. I didn't know because the WWE has been half solid/half crap for quite a while and I just plain stopped watching for a while.
Just be patient and you'll see TNA pass WWE in the ratings and stay there, just like WCW did and for all the same reasons. Better action, better 'stories', more mature by miles, and even though we all know it isn't real, they don't go ahead and give us a stupid, childish, cartoonish caricature of a product. Can someone please tell McMahon to get the f'ing leprechaun out from under the ring and get an announcer to replace M Cole - how many years has he been doing this? Why does he act surprised 4-5 times a show? This is the kind of nonsense that put WWE in # spot for 2 straight years!

2007-03-24 05:54:18 · answer #2 · answered by phillkovu 2 · 0 3

If TNA was better than WWE, then how come nobody gives a crap about the show and they stayed with the same time slot with the same crappy sales, with the same bad pay they give their men? The WWE still sells out big arenas, makes more money on their merchandise, and makes millionaires out of their talent! But, somehow, TNA is so great nobody notices them or watches them on a regular basis. If TNA is or was better, they would have been at least competing with WWE the way WCW did, HEAD TO HEAD, and have a huge ratings war the WWE as well! But hey, TNA is supposed to be better! bwaahahahahahahahahahaahahahaha! dork!
WHAT KIND OF A STUPID QUESTION WAS THAT?!

LOL

2007-03-24 05:59:46 · answer #3 · answered by NEXUS 2 · 0 3

TNA is better when it comes to wrestling
WWE is better when it comes to storylines
Both shows have their respective pros and cons, and I think it's better if the fans just sat back and enjoy the fact that they now have two shows to satisfy their love of everything wrestling, instead of fighting which show is better. But that's just my humble opinion :)

2007-03-24 06:09:00 · answer #4 · answered by JK Sy 3 · 0 2

TNA has only come good last year they were hopless 2 years ago

2007-03-24 05:55:41 · answer #5 · answered by Sweet 2 · 2 1

I still think it's better than WWE, but that's just my opinion.

2007-03-24 05:59:53 · answer #6 · answered by revman_237 4 · 0 3

NEVA! Whr d hell does tht come from btw?

2007-03-24 05:44:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

nope

2007-03-24 08:31:00 · answer #8 · answered by PrimeTime 3 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers