2007-03-23 20:50:33 · 12 answers · asked by Chi Nu 2 in Sports ➔ Cricket
i don't think so. bz india lack team spirit
2007-03-23 21:28:59 · answer #1 · answered by math 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes, Sreesanth could have made a difference . He is a young and talented player and should have got an chance to play. India should have taken him in the match with Srilanka.
2007-03-24 04:03:04 · answer #2 · answered by NEHA 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
may be or may be not
but i think the real problem with indian team was lack of team spirit and intensity on the field
they could have or lets say should have played better...
but guys don't worry,haar kar jeetne mein hi mazaa hai
And hope 4 a Bermudan win against BAN
2007-03-24 11:14:07 · answer #3 · answered by coolakks 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is a bundle of energy should have been played against Bermuda to assess his form.
Would have quite made some difference.
2007-03-24 05:45:34 · answer #4 · answered by balaGraju 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, he is a very good bowlerand would have taken wickets without being expensive. He can also bat well
2007-03-24 03:58:03 · answer #5 · answered by thukraldheeraj 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes,he would have replced ajit.he woud take the wicket.the sl's batted much at the end.he would have got them out atleast n could have set a less margin.not only him,anil aso could have been the 5th bowler.
2007-03-25 03:46:08 · answer #6 · answered by rinu n 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes he would have give the Indian team the extra bit of spirit.Also a decent attack with aggression
2007-03-24 03:54:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We have talked of everything lets talk about the unseen heroes also
2007-03-27 10:37:30 · answer #8 · answered by goutham p 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
nothing can save indian team. indian team is like a chain of dominos, if one falls they all fall to ground.
2007-03-24 04:31:50 · answer #9 · answered by joseph m 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes we would have much earlier
2007-03-24 06:49:21 · answer #10 · answered by john 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋