That would make the past four presidencies Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton
What would this say about our democratic process?
2007-03-23 18:44:48 · 19 answers · asked by Yuff 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I think Randy, Paula, and Simon should pick our next president.
2007-03-23 18:47:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It just means that there are coincidences. I think we all know true power is already concentrated in the hands of a select few anyway in thus country, and having four presidents coming from two families would sort of highlight that point, even though you are tlaking about almost four entirely different idealogical people.
2007-03-24 07:09:44 · answer #2 · answered by Patrick M 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We are inherently people who worships others. Despite what we say, Americans do believe that certain families are superior to others. This also proves that the democrats are not any better than the Republicans on this elitist mindset. How else do we explain that people actually listen to actors for political advise. At least Ben Stein had some political experience when he called me to vote for Swartzenegger.
2007-03-23 18:53:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
First ofall, many arue that thee even is a true democratic process- secondly, don't think this country has any shortage of men who think that a woman should NOT run the country.
Most of this iecause many people don't believe a woman should usurp authority over a man- suh as a pastor.
TO ANYONE- NOT LIVING WIT THAT BELIEF SYSTEM DAY-TO-DAY
this just sounds shovnistic an ridiculous----
And th truth is, Maybe she could whoop circles around the men-folk---but listen, a person's eliefs and trust in God far outweigh what some think is rightin their own eyes.
2007-03-23 18:49:39 · answer #4 · answered by answermaker96 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
that we should just give up and become a dual monarchy? Come on, next up is Hilary, Then Jeb Bush, then Chelsea Clinton, then George P. Bush from florida, then....Socks, the Clinton's cat?
2007-03-23 18:49:20 · answer #5 · answered by steve g 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
technically it would be bush clinton clinton bush bush clinton. and my family and i already have a contingency plan for such a horrible this happening. we are moving to Oman. and it would say nothing about the process it would just say a lot about the people of the USA. they vote for hateful ignorrant sycophantic fem Nazis for president.
2007-03-24 00:10:53 · answer #6 · answered by big_john_719 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOL.
I once thought how much is it going to suck when our kids have to remember that there were 2 diffrent Bushs that no one really liked and both basically did the same things.
2007-03-23 18:48:36 · answer #7 · answered by Timothy C 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
As for as Hillary, it would not be a democratic process, it would mean total disaster for the US.
2007-03-23 18:50:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would be shocked. She is much more liberal than her husband who supported keeping the govt from growing and balancing the govt. I suspect America is too conservative to elect her. Indeed, there is a long term trend in American to be more conservative as children of big families tend to be conservative and liberals have more pets than kids; pets can't vote.
2007-03-23 18:50:08 · answer #9 · answered by Lighthearted 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's been a joke for a while now. 6 years, to be exact. Non-mainstream candidates should be supported, and the two joker-parties should all be locked away forever.
2007-03-23 18:49:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Family dynasties must be abolished in order to give others the right to serve properly eliminating sexual philanderers and war mongers.
2007-03-23 23:07:01 · answer #11 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋