English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am just curious but the show Maury does a lot on dna testing of children.Many men are finding out the child isn't theirs.We know most marriages end in divorce with the man losing everything and having to pay alimony.Clearly,this is sexist and needs to be adressed.It exposes the true hypocrisy of female chauvinism as studies now show the most important parent after 4 is the father.But what happens when he is not the father?Why are the courts clearly so sexist against men?Women now make the same money as men.I am not sure why men are so apathetic,but that apathy has led to increased drug use by children and women(cnn 30 million soccer moms on crystal meth),increased suicide,increased crime,teen pregnancies etc.Society will ultimately pay for this.But what about men who have been lied to by lying wives and gf's.Studies in time mag. now show 49 percent of women cheat.Not only giving innocent men diseases but forcing them to raise children that are not their own.Can't men sue for damages?

2007-03-23 18:29:00 · 9 answers · asked by crashshort2002 1 in Family & Relationships Marriage & Divorce

9 answers

Sue for what? What about men who have children by other women outside of marriage. Should woman also be able to sue their husbands? It is not illegal. How would you legislate morality?

2007-03-23 18:38:05 · answer #1 · answered by Ti 7 · 0 1

The laws are changing now. I heard where if you're not the father you no longer have to pay for the child. And, you're right in that in "some cases" women make the same salary as men but the statistics prove it that women still earn less then men. But just like in any divorce if a woman has a child and is not educated then the ex-husband (since he's leaving her) must provide education for that ex-wife so she can pay for some bills for the child in the future. If a woman already has education and a job when a couple divorces then the man does not owe her any alimony.

You asked too many questions for only two points. You talked about drugs, divorce stats, suicides, diseases, etc. You said 49 percent of women cheat, but 49 percent of men cheat as well.

2007-03-23 18:39:50 · answer #2 · answered by sophieb 7 · 0 1

I can't argue with your figures or where you got them from. They clearly show one side and are from one survey, they're sure to be variations in them. I can see they're clearly not accurate from here but I won't argue them now.

As stated Maury is there for Entertainment and I don't watch him all the time, it's dehumanizing and you can see, as in the Jerry Springer show, it's set up and they push for problems in the hope of creating a disaster for entertainment. This should be taken off the air. It's a sexist, raciest show. If you haven't noticed.

There is a way for men to test this law about the few that I've heard about. Wives that have babies that their husbands aren't the fathers, I don't know of any personally and haven't heard of any but, I'm sure there out there if Maury says there are. It's called divorce and proof like in a DNA test. The father, through the test would be the one made to pay.

2007-03-23 21:20:11 · answer #3 · answered by cowboydoc 7 · 0 0

I agree with you. Men should not have to pay child support for a child that they have found out is not theirs.

On the other hand...I disagree with the father being the most important parent after 4. Both parents are equally important. And I'm not sure about the whole drug use thing. I don't believe it's a new thing...it's just now that we hear about it a lot more.

2007-03-23 18:35:24 · answer #4 · answered by Smooch The Pooch 7 · 1 0

curiously you're new to the area of reproductive decision. In essence, women human beings have selections, adult males have accountability. the daddy is on an identical airplane as a stranger whilst it is composed of attempting to guard his unborn baby. this is, his opinion does not remember. This brings up an entire 'nuther factor to the term "decision". it is "her physique; her decision", ... different than now and back it is not. it rather is undesirable to do obtainable injury to a fetus yet to no longer kill it. it is relating to the main convoluted hypocrisy i've got ever seen. needless to say, some nonetheless choose in charge a guy... for those, he has no recommendations. Get it? it is not a guy's fault whilst a woman makes a stupid decision, ever.

2016-12-08 09:57:25 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I think it should be a law that there are dna tests done immediately after birth. Because alot of guys are lied to and I am worried that it will happen to my son. You guys need to band together and get a law made. You can do it but someone has to take the first step.

2007-03-24 02:24:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If you don't want to take the risk then don't get marry.

2007-03-23 18:40:12 · answer #7 · answered by Joe Guy 3 · 0 1

Oh dear God. This would be funny if it weren't so sad.

2007-03-23 19:09:26 · answer #8 · answered by amivins 3 · 0 1

Um...you do know that Maury is on tv for ENTERTAINMENT value...?

2007-03-23 18:32:50 · answer #9 · answered by Blitz 3 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers