I know they are kinda the same aren't they? but i will have to say old ecw ruled!!
2007-03-23 18:13:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by RVD-RKA 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Both the same?? No they're not. ECW was a lot, a lot, A LOT more freelance than TNA is. Old ECW just didnt give a sh*t. As long as those guys gave you everything they had, they didnt give a damn about what went wrong or any type of sh*t like that. Ever seen anyone like New Jack on TNA?
2007-03-24 02:35:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by wtf*ftw 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are not the same. The "old" ECW was groundbreaking with their matches and stars, they were unlike anything around at the time. The larger promotions tried desperately to copy the edginess and excitement. TNA is a knockoff.
2007-03-24 03:21:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by gus_zalenski 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
The old ECW had even better in ring action then TNA does but TNA has better story lines.
2007-03-24 02:00:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by HULK RULES!! 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
TNA is no better than the current ECW. What makes you think they could even sniff the old ECW's jock strap?
2007-03-24 01:27:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Old ECW. You dont see guys in tna getting their heads grinded by cheese gratters
2007-03-24 07:41:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by UltimaFenrir28 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree they are similar, but as a biased Sting/Angle/Raven Fan. I'd say TNA. If you would have bet me 10 years ago they would all be wrestling in the same promotion...I'd be broke!
2007-03-24 02:46:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by catch3422 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
WHAT THE HELL ARE U GUYS TALKING ABOUT OLD ECW WAS ALL EXTREME TNA HAS RULES AND ALL KINDS OF STUFF THEY DON'T HAVE FIRY TABLES AND 30 FT. HIGH LADDERS AND THEY DON'T TAKE IT TO THE EXTREME THEY HAVE LOADS OF SUCURITY
2007-03-24 01:17:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
old ecw, not the same not even similar.
2007-03-28 01:10:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by o.O 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
old ecw.
ill never like tna.
2007-03-24 03:48:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋