1. Unity distinguishable from nothingness is as "part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, limit, link, sensation, influence, origin, derivative, rule, condition, intent, and fulfillment."
2. Whatever is distinguishable from nothingness is as "part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, limit, link, sensation, influence, origin, derivative, rule, condition, intent, and fulfillment."
Which one is more effective way to say?
2007-03-23 17:36:12 · 8 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
one
2007-03-23 17:39:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
2
2007-03-24 00:39:58 · answer #2 · answered by Jade 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whatever is distinguishable from nothing is at first only the appearance of something of a kind we know is at least knowable as positively existent as the negation for a non-being: differentiation. Number 2 but with the word 'or' between each word. i.e.
2. Whatever is distinguishable from nothingness is as "part or whole or equivalence or uniqueness or limit or link etc. etc., sensation, influence, origin, derivative, rule, condition, intent, and fulfillment."
2007-03-24 21:07:25 · answer #3 · answered by Psyengine 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shalom Samlyn,
Are you saying;
Deity of consistent Pantheism is in no wise distinguisable from nothingness?
Unite to form a unique and complex whole, a "complexure" whose "parts" are themselves strictly inseperable, albeit distinguishable, contextures?
http://www.springerlink.com
But one is distinguishable from another by the place where they stop...out of which everything was made...?
http://www.innerexplorations.com
Please pardon me for not fully understanding but I thought these might be something connected to this. ~(~
2007-03-24 02:01:05 · answer #4 · answered by gigiemilu 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They seem the same to me. Effectiveness of words depend upon the hearer as much as the speaker.
"66. O CHILDREN OF THE DIVINE AND INVISIBLE ESSENCE!
Ye shall be hindered from loving Me and souls shall be perturbed as they make mention of Me. For minds cannot grasp Me nor hearts contain Me.
67. O SON OF BEAUTY!
By My spirit and by My favor! By My mercy and by My beauty! All that I have revealed unto thee with the tongue of power, and have written for thee with the pen of might, hath been in accordance with thy capacity and understanding, not with My state and the melody of My voice."
(Baha'u'llah, The Arabic Hidden Words)
2007-03-24 01:11:09 · answer #5 · answered by Gravitar or not... 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The use of the word 'as' in both alternatives is confusing.
2007-03-25 07:02:04 · answer #6 · answered by small 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What is more effective? Acceptance. Acceptance to understand you need serious help.
2007-03-24 00:41:03 · answer #7 · answered by ark 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
both statement are vague and elusive
2007-03-24 00:50:36 · answer #8 · answered by hitherto 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋