If Bush wasn't a liar why won't he or his administration testify under oath?

Question

Bush wouldn't testify under oath for the 9-11 investigation or for the present fiasco in which attorneys were fired so that Bush and Gonzales could rush in the unconstitutional Patriot Act.

It is more than apparent that Bush and his gang of mobsters in Washington D.C. have something to hide when they won't testify under oath. What they are telling the American people is this: "We are going to lie, and therefore we aren't going to testify under oath"

I foolishly used to support the man, but it didn't take me long to figure out Bush is a liar, a traitor, a crook, a murderer, and a puppet for the terrorist State of Israel.

Answer 1

During war, the President should focus on the issues instead of this other garbage that you are talking about.

When you are at war you don't let the enemy know your hand. Bush has helped prevent another 9/11 !!

Answer 2

with the help of definition certainty has no bias. besides the fact that, i think of that the reluctance of Bush to permit individuals of his administration to testify under oath is two fold. first of all there is stuff that's unlikely to lead them to look all that good if it comes out. a number of it's going to make him look undesirable to his very own celebration like questioning the loyalty of civil servant group who're comprehend to have supported different Republican applicants interior the primaries. a number of that's in all possibility unlawful or will actual be unpopular. 2nd of all there is the concept of "government privilege" at stake. Bush needs to restoration the Presidency to what pre-Nixon grew to become into called the Imperial Presidency. the administrative branch grew to become into considered as extra substantial than the Legislative branch and actual owed it no longer something. he's attempting to declare that potential back. i think of there's a mixture of self-secure practices and concept at stake.

Answer 3

It's as if, once they take that oath of office, that anything they do is somehow beyond reproach. The spin meisters heads have been spinning like mad in the white house for the past five years trying to put a legitimate face on Bush and the war.
Now it is the time to have their heads rolling.
Randy Cunningham....check
Tom Delay...check
Donald Rumsfeld....check
Alberto Gonzales...

Answer 4

What the administratioin objects to is allowing a hostile congress to grill his closest advisors under oath about a matter that does not rise to the level of illegality or scandal.
This is politics at its worst and shows just what a bunch of time wasting puling partisan pukes the democrats can be when they get a little power to abuse.

Answer 5

It's called "plausible deniability", and it dries up and becomes useless quite rapidly among a group of people under oath and under penalty of law.

I trhink that when the truth finally does come out about the last five or six years, we will be utterly horrified.

Answer 6

Why does being under oath matter? Lying to a closed session of Congress gives you the same penalty as lying under oath. The whole "under oath" nonsense is nothing more than a political game.

Answer 7

The president doesn't need to testify under oath. Its his presidential privledge to fire one or all of the attorneys as they serve as his pleasure. Remember Bill fired all 93 at one go or does he count. Sounds like another bush hate job.

Answer 8

I was going to attempt a rational argument with you, but after you called Israel a terrorist state, I realized there is no point.

What do you think we should do with Israel - let the savages surrounding them bring another Holocaust?

Answer 9

I think one of the previous answerers has it correct when he says Bush has never accepted responsibility for anything in his life.

I would go one step further. I think people like our dear prez will be awarded with their own psychological classification during the 2nd Obama term in office. This decision by the American Psychological Association will set off a firestorm and will not provide any benefit for Ex King George as he will be living in South America by that time.

Answer 10

No president - irregardless of political affiliation - would allow his people to testify under oath or have transcripts of the questioning allowed during a witch hunt by the opposing party.

Think about it: If Bush is all of the things you accuse him of being and there was even a shred of valid evidence to support these contentions - the democrats would have impeached him long ago.