wouldn't you want a president that actually worries about our enviroment?
2007-03-23 15:22:40 · 24 answers · asked by Chase 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
NO and if Al Gore really worried about the environment he wouldn't use 20 times as much energy as the average home in TN and he wouldn't fly around everywhere in a chartered jet plane.
Al Gore is only worried about one thing, Al Gore.
2007-03-23 15:30:00 · answer #1 · answered by plezurgui 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Hell definite. He grew to become into an substantial area of the Clinton Presidency and has extra adventure than any candidate interior the race. He additionally has come down from the mountain in an attempt to speak after questioning he had won the Presidency and then having it taken away. So he's waiting. additionally, all areas of the Democratic coalition can help Gore, Conservative, middle and liberal, or maybe many tremendously liberal democrats might get at the back of Gore. He can get the nomination in 2 techniques. Win it outright on the Democratic convention with the help of working and accumulating delegates or he could be drafted if no person wins the 1st pollat the convention. Gore may well be the ideal coalition candidate around. deliver him a digital mail and ask him to run. thank you for the question.
2016-10-20 07:58:40 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hi there ain't that what AL Gore is doing about the climate changing. ( did vote for him but he got cheated.) all info was on news. would I vote again this time it's a tough election.
Vice President Al Gore
www.chbn.com - Al Gore testifies on climate change at the House Energy and Science Committees.
I think no matter whom we vote now these days our voices would not be heard cause once they are in power they forget their own words once in office. and how many in office have fail the system It makes us or to me why vote? money to them is everything even with a white lie in between.
only one man can be trusted GOD he never fails us we fail him.
be well be safe
2007-03-23 15:39:47 · answer #3 · answered by sugarlove_one 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Hell no I wouldn't vote for that schmuck! His way of caring for the environment will end up making all middle and lower class people suffer the consequences by paying a ton more in taxes and higher gas and utility bills; all the while people like Gore will still live their lavish lifestyle. "But they buy carbon offsets"....what a f*cking joke that is!May as well make indictment offsets for rich murder suspects, that's about how much sense carbon offsets make!
2007-03-23 15:38:57 · answer #4 · answered by Bunz 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Uhh, how about a big fat NO. We tried voting hilbilly before...it doesn't work (for us) however apparently they get all sorts of good under the desk treament :). Just kidding around, seriously though the guy is like a slimy used car salesman, no way does he need to be in charge of an entire country. He's a goober!
2007-03-23 15:37:59 · answer #5 · answered by SadToday22 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No, he lies like a cheap carpet. At least Bush's house is more green than Gore's imagination. Its one thing to live it, another to do it. Tell Gore when he walks the walk then maybe hes got something to stand on but as it is right now Gore is talkin smack.
2007-03-23 15:47:27 · answer #6 · answered by mr_fixit_11 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
NO. What has Al Gore done for us? He is very opinionated and only cares about something that will never happen. I wanted him to win in 2000 but not anymore. GO BUSH and GO McCAIN!!! I'm being super cereal. ManBearPig exists o.k. Im super duper cereal.
2007-03-23 15:31:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
America 's Corporatacracy is leading the human race down a path of global extinction. Representing only 5% of the world population, the United States consumes 25% of the world's energy and possesses approximately 27% of its wealth. Through lobbying efforts and major campaign donations, the major oil companies ensure the implementation of government policies that ensure continued dependence on fossil fuels, a non-renewable resource (for more on this, study the theory of Hubbert Peak theory at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peak_oil). Despite being a significant contributor to the greenhouse effect, the US Plutocracy has spent millions of dollars to create junk science (look to efforts by the Cato Institute) to "debunk" the notion of global warming, and has refused to sign the Kyoto Treaty. The United States innovated, tested (on hundreds of thousands of human beings), and possesses devastating nuclear weapons. Yet with blatant hubris and hypocrisy, our ruling Oligarchs attempt to dictate which nations can and cannot develop nuclear capabilities. America 's allies, like Pakistan , India , and Israel have developed nuclear weaponry with America 's blessing, while countries like Iran are forbidden to even acquire the technology to generate nuclear power. The ruling Aristocracy of the United States has long exhibited a flagrant disregard for international law, world opinion, and most recently, for the United Nations (consider the appointment of John Bolton as America's UN "ambassador").
So naturally Exxon and their ilk hate Al Gore.
2007-03-23 15:27:02 · answer #8 · answered by dstr 6 · 2⤊ 5⤋
In general, probably not, but wouldn't I have to at least know who he was running against before I could make my decision?
2007-03-23 15:30:22 · answer #9 · answered by bkc99xx 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Dear Mr Gore, We have told you time and time again. You suck, you cant lead yourself to the bathroom, Stop using other names on yahoo. No we will not vote for you...AGAIN. Oh...thank you for making the internet...I hear its gonna catch on the next few years
2007-03-23 15:55:56 · answer #10 · answered by recon 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋