2007-03-23 14:09:17 · 13 answers · asked by WJ 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
if you have no clue what "winning is" or "how to do it"... then yes... you should leave...
the question is... what are we doing there... and how can we do it (win)... based on the facts of the situation...
civil wars aren't good times to try nation building... it's like building a sand castle during high tide, thinking if you stay longer and keep trying eventually the sand will hold out the water
2007-03-23 14:32:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You stupid dems still think this war was wrong. Would you rather have the disaster of 9/11 two or three times a year. It has been proved over and over again that Saddam had WMDs and that the 27 or so UN resolutions let him to move his WMDs to Iran. This War was not about oil....
2007-03-23 14:29:09 · answer #2 · answered by Rich 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you think this invasion of Iraq is right? There are now even Iraq vets-by partisan-who are protesting it. If it's for oil rights why can't this pres just come out and say it. Or is it mainly for contractor's pocketbooks the number of them over there making $$ while our troops shorted of gear & back-up are being blown to bits(kinda like a war video game to some). Or is it to enable leadership to initiate theNWO by slowly withdrawing rights while building up the rights and power of the govt.
2007-03-23 14:16:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
the Iraq war was based on lie after lie after lie,,, the troops don't even know what their mission is anymore,, it has changed so many times,,, when the Iraqis stand up,, Americans will stand down,,, well the Iraqis are running,, the US spends millions of dollars to train them,, and the at the first sign of a suicide bomber,, they run the other way,, then they use our own weapons against us,, those who are armed in the first place,, many aren't,,, Reagan got into the middle of a civil war in Lebanon in 1983 and he CUT and RAN,, Republicans were embarrassed then,, and they are afraid that they will be called cowardice again,,, Bush has contradicted himself so many times,, he has been discredited,,, he has no credibility in America or the World,,, 4 years of defeat,, one failed policy after another,,, the right wing conservatives are afraid that they will be doomed to damnation,,, if they don't follow Bush,,, our enemies are attacking us 150 times a day in Iraq,, being involved in another civil war has resulted in another fiasco,, maybe,, Reagan was right in 1983 to pull out.....
2007-03-23 14:29:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yeah they should end war in Iraq and end sending black soldiers anywhere in the world...we are losing lots of wars lately!
2007-03-23 14:24:56 · answer #5 · answered by WO LEE 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Please stop being so naive.
The neo-con objectives have been accomplished.
It is time to pull out without losing face.
So stick the burden of pulling out onto the Dems - their camp seems to like that kind of stuff.
There is no need to stay in Iraq - the mission has been accomplished, if they go to civil war that's their problem.
2007-03-23 14:20:42 · answer #6 · answered by Nicholas J 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I wouldn't say that. The Democrats originally voted for sending troops to Iraq, thinking that Iraq and Saddam were a threat. They were duped. There was no threat and they were lied to. Now they're peeved.
2007-03-23 14:12:47 · answer #7 · answered by CC 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
No matter how wrong it may be we should continue the course, that's what you are implying. To me that's just plain stupidity. It's over, some people just refuse to believe.
2007-03-23 14:19:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Three years and ten months later isn't ASAP
2007-03-23 14:16:48 · answer #9 · answered by razor 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
"There is no better way to support those who are fighting in Iraq than to guarantee that no more of them die in the service of political miscalculation"
Source(s):
Anna Quindlen, Newsweek 2/19/07
2007-03-23 14:12:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋