Read this article first, please....
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070323/ap_on_he_me/drugged_to_death
Shouldn't the teachers, social workers, and or physician/pharmicist be facing the same charges? Each of them saw a problem, and neglected to adequately act upon it. If they had, little Rebecca would probably still be alive right now.
I'm sorry, I don't see how all of them can seem to justify their non-response in any way.....this was a 4 year old little girl with her whole life ahead of her!!!!
2007-03-23
11:26:52
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Critter Lady
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
I suppose this is one article that got to me, cause I'm sitting here crying my heart out knowing that that little girl didn't get the chance to live.
However, as a nation, I can't help but wonder if we do enough to protect children under circumstances such as these. If they were all seeing a problem, why didn't she get help?
I just don't understand......
2007-03-23
11:38:58 ·
update #1
I wanted to point something out to the first poster.....
While they weren't DIRECT accomplices, they could still be guilty of accessory to the crime, since their actions (or in this case, inactions) resulted in the death of a child.
There is a direct correlation between actions and results here, don't you think?
2007-03-23
11:51:09 ·
update #2