I'm certain others would disagree with me, but I begin with the assumption that everything is propaganda -- that is, biased. The key isn't to filter before searching for information, but rather to filter all information and try to make an informed decision from numerous sides, if possible.
I used to be a reporter and editor for a couple newspapers and a magazine. Regardless of the struggle for objectivity, intent can and does get in the way.
By the way: I think it's a fallacy to trust information that's only delivered in an articulate manner. Some of the most compelling pieces I've heard/seen/read have not been put together in an "intelligent" fashion...
2007-03-23 11:30:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I check different places. The more interesting the story is, the more places I check. This sometimes including looking at places that are often said to be biased, just to see what they say. I also worry more if it is TRUE or not, and don't worry so much about it being biased.
2007-03-23 18:34:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Eric 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
my information sources are sacrosanct
last time i replied to one such as this question bbc got shut [dumbed down]
unbiased info is in itself a deciet
i trust books in the referance libary
not the gutted public liberies
but real news papers [books] bios ,reports ,auto biographies
but to list them is to give neo con messianics too much
but here is how i really do it real time divination
god is the living god
i get away from the man /time cccrap and get down live time with nature , its called syn-crone -icity.
the living god in sync.
that and divination.
2007-03-23 18:29:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I like to listen to NPR radio. I find it to be unbiased and intellegent.
2007-03-23 18:21:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Karrose 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
FOX News, of coarse!
2007-03-23 18:27:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋