I absolutely think it should be legalized. I don't smoke pot anymore, but I agree that it should. The main reason is by legalizing pot state and local governments can help aleviate thier over streched budgets. I think states are losing out on millions of dollars.
You regulate the pot industry just like the liquor industry. Limit the number of growers, have them pay a fee to be a licensed grower, charge businesses that will sell pot a pot license each of these would have a annual renewel fee, plus a tax on the product itself.
Also contrary to popular belief, weed isn't a gateway drug, that leads to worse stuff. I had a friend that would do crank, coke and meth, but wouldn't smoke weed.
Lastly, people aren't going to run out and start smoking pot just because it became legal. I can assure there isn't anybody sitting on thier couch sitting around thinking" wow i'd smoke a blunt if only it were legal.
2007-03-23 11:48:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by evil_paul 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You have some wonderful justifications for legalizing marijuana, but the whole line of argument looks at the question from the wrong direction.
The real question should be "What justification exists for making marijuana use and possession illegal?" If there is no legitimate answer to this question, then it should not be illegal.
There are three broad categories to the responses that will be given to this question. 1) it causes some other behavior (violence, etc), 2) it harms the individual using it, and 3) it leads to other drugs.
1) I'm all for outlawing violence. If some people who smoke pot have a tendency to rob banks, I'm certainly not in favor of making robbery legal.
2) So what. I'm not suggesting we make any kind of self-destructive behavior a burden on society, but I'd point out that this is the effect of criminalizing any behavior at all. Making robbery illegal places a burden on society to enforce the law, and it's one I'm willing to accept. I'm not so eager to make voluntarily and knowingly swallowing rat poison a felony.
3) I have enough empirical evidence that suggests otherwise that I find any data to the contrary laughable.
Stop defending the idea of making it legal. Start requiring supporters of the existing law to justify it.
2007-03-23 11:31:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by open4one 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that it should be legalized and then taxed so high that there is more tax on it than actual price. Seeds for it sold at a Wal-Mart with an extreme tax could generate millions seeing as how many people shop there. As many people as there is that use weed, all of the money that could be generated could get the government out of debt, and maybe the debt counter on the country may actually go down, and not up.
2007-03-23 13:18:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by your_worst_nightmare_101 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
$113 billion is spent on marijuana each 3 hundred and sixty 5 days interior the U.S., and due to the federal prohibition *each* greenback of it is going at as quickly as into the palms of criminals. some distance from battling human beings from making use of marijuana, the prohibition instead creates 0 criminal grant amid large and unrelenting call for. the size of the wear and tear this motives some distance exceeds any income gained from preserving marijuana unlawful. in accordance to the ONDCP, a minimum of sixty p.c. of Mexican drug cartel funds comes from merchandising marijuana interior the U.S., they safeguard this gross sales via brutally torturing, murdering and dismembering endless harmless human beings. If we can end human beings making use of marijuana then we'd desire to realize this NOW, yet as quickly as we can't then we'd desire to legalize the production and sale of marijuana to adults with after-tax expenditures set too low for the cartels to verify. one way or the different, we'd desire to tension the cartels out of the marijuana industry and get rid of their relatively rewarding marijuana earning - no corporation can face up to the shortcoming of sixty p.c. of its gross sales! as much as now, the cartels have amassed extra effective than one hundred,000 "foot squaddies" and perform in 230 U.S. cities, and that is now believed that the cartels are "morphing into, or making elementary reason with, what could be seen an insurgency" (Secretary of State Clinton, 09/09/2010). The longer the cartels are allowed to make the main the prohibition the extra efficient they are going to get and the extra our own own risk-free practices would be put in jeopardy.
2016-10-19 11:16:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
the only reason mary jane is illegal in the first place is becuase the first head of the created FDA was a psychotic who banned everything, including booze and he even tried to have pharmaceuticals severely restricted. the booze thing was eventually overturned, but the pot thing is still ongoing. even though the government has m13 which basically is more medicinal pain reliever and research shows it is even more of a treatment for depression than mood stabilizers and anti depressants.
2007-03-23 13:28:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by The Simurgh 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
In my opinion, it should not be legalized. I am not against smoking weed. However, until they can figure out if someone is high, like they do for drunk drivers using breathalizers, while driving then it should not be legalized.
Some people can drive fine while high, while others cannot. There are too many irresponsible people who would chose to drive while high for it to be legalized.
2007-03-23 11:24:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by I_love_my_dogs 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Legalized, no. I think the path to take with regards to marijuana is decriminalization. We should treat marijuana much the same way the Dutch do.
2007-03-23 11:23:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by go avs! 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If pot was legalized, the taxes generated could fund the drug enforcement of serious drugs like meth and heroin.
Not to mention the point that it is safer than alcohol in every respect.
2007-03-23 11:22:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes!
2007-03-23 11:21:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
No! We don't need any more impaired drivers on the roads!
2007-03-23 11:43:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by KJLV 1
·
0⤊
0⤋