English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

40 answers

hell yeah, that pretzel head starts wars in countries he dont even know how to spell, that bush would of done humanity a favour if he died whilst choaking on that pretzel. he done afganistan, iraq and now iran in......who next, it needs to be stopped but the red necks and hill billies along with his family the KKK keep him in power cause they love blood shed...........put Obama or Al gore in power and stop voting for that air head u bush police.
by the way if someone reports me again i'll go nuts, i need the points!
dont u know this is another vietnam and hitler massacre u bush puppets, bush gives the terrorists a target and amunition to fight. what happens if pretzel started on a country who actually had weapons...like china we will b nuclear dust......thats y this aint a war cause if iraq fights to defend country they r classed a terrorist, bush is a coward and acting out his racist cowboys and red indians where he invade and drives natives out whilst making the iraqis strip and be human t.v areils

2007-03-23 10:55:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7 3

That's doubtful. Not sure why GWB is perceived as the problem. Oh wait, you think he bombed the WTC and the Pentagon don't you? Yeah, and this is a war for oil so that's why it's MORE expensive because there's MORE of it since we occupy Iraq. Makes sense. I guess that's why the Iranians abducted British soldiers in Iraqi waters today too. It's all Bush's fault. Darn that man.

Maybe if Gore were running the show, we'd have a fireside chat with Osama and President Tom (Iran) and Saddam (because he wouldn't have been hanged) to discuss how all that nasty fighting is causing global warming. Why goodness, the Captain was right!! Love will keep us together.

2007-03-23 10:59:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

The world would be a safer place for terrorists and oppresive dictators without George Bush but in reality the world would not change at all with or without George Bush. I mean honestly has everyone forgotten how patriotic everyone was when 9/11 happened? The cowardly terrorists would have attacked the twin towers no matter who was in office and the president at the time (no matter who it was) would have made the same choice because it was the right choice. The only reason that everyone hates President Bush so much is due to media sensationalism by liberal backed and ran media outlets. Just look for example the fervor the media has produced on the firing of a few US attorneys but in 1993 the Clinton administration fired ALL of the US attorneys and not one media outlet gave it more than a page 5 byline.

2007-03-23 10:56:19 · answer #3 · answered by wforeman3 1 · 0 5

No, he has definitely helped to stop the terrorists from attacking us, they are too busy killing other Arabs and Afghans. Wooden Indian Gore would not have reacted forcefully and Kerry showed what a pea-brain he was. The Democrats tried to win two elections by using every type of voter fraud they could think of and their losses convinced them that the Republicans had just outdone them in fraud. [Which they hadn't.]

If not for Bush theTaliban would still be beheading women and children on soccer[football] fields in the name of Allah and Saddam would be murdering and raping Iraq while plotting to build back his military power. Gore would never have invaded either country and Al-Queda would still be flying planes into buildings.

Either you believe that there are things worth fighting and dying for or you roll over and let yourself be trampled to death. Those who cry that nothing is worth the life of one soldier are cowards who value nothing.

Now, George Bush is just a man like any other, fundamentally good, well-intentioned. He has a speech problem, he stumbles over words. He makes mistakes like anyone might. As any world leader he depends upon the people around him for advice. They are a group of people, like a committee, and remember that a camel is a horse designed by a committee. There is such a thing a bad information and sometimes believing and accepting bad advice. Every leader of every country has the same problem. So lighten up and have some understanding.

2007-03-23 18:16:50 · answer #4 · answered by Taganan 3 · 0 1

Tony Blair and George Bush are masked murderers and I think they should be shown for the cowards they really are.They started a war that they are not even fighting,they are nice and safe whilst there are hundreds of thousands of people losing their lives,innocent men,woman and children,whole familes have been murdered!!!George started a war thats not going the way he likes it andTony Blair is his lapdog.

2007-03-23 11:58:13 · answer #5 · answered by xxpink_carnationxx 1 · 1 0

sadam hussain, was a big toothache and the world would not pull the tooth so, along came the dentist george bush, and pulls the tooth, but infection got in and caused an incurable absess,all the nations of the earth have one kind of toothache
or anouther, including britain and america, the muslim dentists are trying to pull it.

2007-03-23 12:47:58 · answer #6 · answered by trucker 5 · 0 0

As old Chinese proverb say A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

2007-03-23 10:53:08 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 0 1

No, the world is a dangerous place because of the very smart people put empowered him.... and the not so bright ones who gave him a vote !

2007-03-23 10:51:13 · answer #8 · answered by NLBNLB 6 · 4 2

Yes, it certainly would be. If the link below is anything to go by he could be getting his sooner than he thinks. Don't know if our American friends have seen it yet, but they might want to check it out:

http://www.deathofapresident.com/

2007-03-23 11:09:35 · answer #9 · answered by Jock 6 · 0 0

I felt safer under Clinton,

2007-03-23 10:55:21 · answer #10 · answered by mikeodonagh 3 · 5 1

fedest.com, questions and answers