Dear Sir:
You refer, of course, to a recent Sci Fi Movie Plot which had this as its main "gotcha" line. If you bought this, you would go along with every thing else that followed.
First of all, such a planet would have been seen by any one of the many space probes which we have sent aloft in the past fifteen years or so. Two, at least, are in very deep space and could have seen any planet hiding on our opposite Sun side.
Second, viewing our Solar System from distant space is not such a big deal... We have had satelite space probes fly to the planets Saturn, and Mars already. Enroute those probes would have stayed in communication with the Earth and if any planet were on the back side of the Sun, those probes would have detected it because the Earth was moving around the Sun during space probe flight.
Thanks for asking anyhow... Cool Flick.
Regards,
Zah
2007-03-23 11:44:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by zahbudar 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
A planet on the same orbit opposite the sun would have been predicted long before it could have been directly observed by probes or satellites. The gravitational pull of the planed would have disturbed the orbits of other planets much like Pluto and other objects in the outer solar system disturbed the orbit of Neptune.
2007-03-23 12:35:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by April C 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Eris, the main important dwarf planet consumer-friendly, grew to become into got here upon in an ongoing survey at Palomar Observatory's Samuel Oschin telescope with the help of astronomers Mike Brown (Caltech), Chad Trujillo (Gemini Observatory), and David Rabinowitz (Yale college). We formally reported the call on 6 September 2006, and it grew to become into regular and introduced on 13 September 2006.
2016-10-20 07:36:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Although we could never see it from Earth, we could deduce that it's there from its effect on the other inner planets. In particular, it would have a measurable gravitational effect on the orbits of Mercury and Venus and would have completely obscured the tiny relativistic precession of the orbit of Mercury, predicted as a consequence of Einstein's special theory of relativity.
2007-03-23 10:49:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by Isaac Laquedem 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
We have satellites that have gone over the pole of the sun and there is nothing on the other side in our orbit.
2007-03-23 10:40:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Gene 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
RADAR:
RAdio Detection And Ranging
2007-03-23 11:26:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tenth planet discovered in outer solar system
10:35 30 July 2005
NewScientist.com news service
Jeff Hecht
Tools
Enlarge image
These images of the newfound planet were taken in October 2003, each about 90 minutes apart. The planet, circled in white, moves across a background of stars (Image: Samuel Oschin Telescope, Palomar Observatory)Related Articles
New solar system world has a moon
29 July 2005
New world found in outer solar system
29 July 2005
Far-out worlds, just waiting to be found
23 July 2005
Search New Scientist
Contact us
Web Links
Tenth planet, JPL
Mike Brown, Caltech
Astronomers have found a tenth planet, larger than Pluto and nearly three times farther from the Sun as Pluto is today.
Temporarily designated 2003 UB313, the new planet is the most distant object yet seen in the solar system, 97 times farther from the Sun than the Earth is. It also is the largest body yet found orbiting in the Kuiper belt, the group of icy bodies including Pluto which orbit beyond Neptune.
Like Pluto, 2003 UB313 is covered by methane ice, and at its present distance is chilled to just 30°C above absolute zero, says Mike Brown, the Caltech astronomer who announced the discovery on Friday. The sleep-deprived father of a three-week-old daughter, Brown said the discovery was "almost as exciting as having a new baby".
Pluto was the only object known in the Kuiper belt until 1992, but since then astronomers have spotted hundreds more faint, icy bodies with orbits beyond Neptune. Five years ago, Brown's group began a systematic search for big Kuiper belt objects, which earlier yielded Quaoar - about 800 miles in diameter - and Sedna, previously the most distant object known at 91 times the Earth's distance from the Sun.
The survey also yielded the new planet and two other objects only slightly smaller than Pluto, which Brown kept quiet as he analysed the survey data and made new observations to learn more about 2003 UB313.
Tilted orbit
The survey first spotted the new planet in October 2003, but it was not until 8 January 2005 that Brown realised the object was so distant that its brightness meant it had to be very big. Calculations showed it was near the most distant point of its 560-year orbit - in 280 years it will be only 36 times as far from the Sun as the Earth is. (A graphic of its orbit can be viewed here.)
Its orbit is unusual in being tilted 44° from the orbital plane of the Earth and most other planets. Brown suspects the planet's orbit was warped by a series of encounters with Neptune.
Although the planet’s brightness is known, estimating its size requires knowing what fraction of incident light it reflects. Infrared observations could provide that information, but the planet was too faint and cold for the Spitzer Space Telescope to spot.
From that failure, Brown concluded the planet must reflect 50% to 100% of incident light - and thus must be larger than 2300-kilometre-wide Pluto but no larger than 3000 km in diameter. Pluto reflects 60% of visible light, and if the new planet does the same it would be near the large end of that size range.
Hacked data
Brown had hoped to have time to make more observations to pin down more details including the new planet's size and brightness. But Spanish astronomers independently discovered one of the two other big new Kuiper Belt objects, and on 28 July the Minor Planet Center at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Massachusetts published an orbit based on their data for the object it designated 2003 EL61.
The following morning, Brown received a phone call claiming that unknown hackers had stolen some of his data and planned to publish it as their own. (Update, August 1, 2005: The data was in fact accessed via logs of telescope activity that Brown did not realise were made publicly available on the web.) That led him to announce the planet and a third object - temporarily designated 2005 FY9 by the Minor Planet Center.
The discovery is sure to heat up the debate over how to define a planet. Some astronomers claim Pluto is just an overgrown Kuiper-belt object, but Brown thinks it should remain a planet. The International Astronomical Union has avoided a formal definition, but the new object may force the issue. Brown has already proposed a name, but would not disclose it.
The discovery shows "the raw power of the new all-sky surveys" that examine huge areas looking for things that move, says Brad Schaefer, an astronomer at Louisiana State University. The survey has now covered most of the sky, but Brown said a few more big objects may await discovery.
For exclusive news and expert analysis every week subscribe to New Scientist Print Edition
For what's in New Scientist magazine this week see contents
Search all stories
Contact us about this story
Sign up for our free newsletter
Search
Home
News
Solar 'superflare' shredded Earth's ozone
Logistics program tests interplanetary supply chain
Blimps to swim through the air like fish
Nanorockets - the ultimate baby boosters?
Supersonic bullets shoot through the Orion Nebula
Solar System
Space Technology
Human Spaceflight
Astronomy
Special Reports
Autonomous driving systems aim to drive dirty
17:36 23 March 2007
Logistics program tests interplanetary supply chain
17:33 23 March 2007
Blimps to swim through the air like fish
17:30 23 March 2007
Logistics program tests interplanetary supply chain
17:33 23 March 2007
Autonomous driving systems aim to drive dirty
17:36 23 March 2007
Blimps to swim through the air like fish
17:30 23 March 2007
Explore by Subject
Health
Fundamentals
Being Human
Living World
Opinion
Sex and Cloning
SUBSCRIBER LOGIN
username :
password :
help
SUBSCRIPTIONS
Subscribe
Renew
Subscriber? Register now!
Subscribe Contact Us
2007-03-23 10:56:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by golden rider 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Asker has been watching to many "B" sci-fi movies, methinks.
2007-03-23 10:51:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by stargazergurl22 4
·
0⤊
0⤋