http://www.starbulletin.com/2007/03/23/business/story01.html
2007-03-23 10:01:07 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
There are nice people in the world afterall. I see no problem in it. If he wants to be kind and Pay it Forward, I say let him.
2007-03-31 02:53:29 · answer #1 · answered by Pepper 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Kelly is right-the utilities will be way over their ability to pay and they will not be able to keep the mansions unless the guy who gave it to them pays for all that and that is a stretch.
There is also maintenance of the grounds,etc.,etc. that they could not possibly afford. Will they know how to maintain such extravagance they are not used to nor educated about?
As nice a well meant gesture as it was, he would have done better to spread the money around as was suggested by selling the mansions. How often we act out benevelence without engaging our heads as to the ramifications that it can lead to.
2007-03-23 10:46:54 · answer #2 · answered by marlynembrindle 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mr. Boombast, I certainly have in no way been to a billionaire's celebration in the previous. might or no longer that's ok if I got here on your next celebration, Mr. Boombast? in the event that they're all this good, i might desire to be lacking out on an poor lot of funsies! that's somewhat too undesirable that the guy that have been given pushed in grew to become into donning his good healthful. If he have been bare, he might desire to no longer are transforming into so mad! hehe! those varieties of events could be exciting, yet i'm a splash terrified of that shark interior the pool! I certainly tend to consider Mr. Fu**ker's words! ^.^ O_O :-) LOL. thank you for sharing a good shaggy dog tale! ;)
2016-10-20 07:34:07 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes! Since he can not sell them due to the declining real estate market he is hoping they start a fire in the house because they can't afford to pay the utilities necessary to heat the place. Then he can get the insurance money for the homes.
2007-03-23 10:46:32 · answer #4 · answered by Homeless in Phoenix 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Seems like a stupid move to me, those people with a flock of kids more than likely haven't the brains or ambition to better themselves no matter what...if he really wants to help, fix them so they can't have kids anymore, but don't let them live in those homes, ( sorry for the neigbors ) give them support and time to learn something so they can make a living..if they can't stick with it..forget it...
2007-03-23 12:05:18 · answer #5 · answered by xyz 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
makes more sense to sell the mansions and buy more families smaller,more realistic homes.I read that they still have to pay the utility bills,that would be alot of $ on a mansion
2007-03-23 10:09:50 · answer #6 · answered by the dreamy blonde 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sure guilty feelings for Pearl Harbor.
2007-03-29 08:00:41 · answer #7 · answered by steve f 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
perhaps turning them into training schools for better education while housing them with more than 1 family.
2007-03-28 08:06:41 · answer #8 · answered by iwannaknow 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nope. Now they're just bums in nice houses which they will trash out until they get evicted.
2007-03-23 10:35:08 · answer #9 · answered by barefoot_always 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No! Its about teaching how to fish, not placing the fish on a Gold plate and serving it!!
2007-03-29 06:42:10 · answer #10 · answered by LibraCrazyVirgo 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋