So that the US will always be economically superior to other countries
2007-03-23 10:00:54 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
3rd respondant, we weren't founded on democracy, but life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, so, socialism gets rid of liberty from the people, and what do you mean a democracy again?
2007-03-23 10:05:37 · update #1
When you consider the extent the U.S. went to in order combat socialism in the last century, your question is somewhat ill-conceived. Capitalism & 'Comparative advantage' both rely on the expansion of markets, not isolation. Our 'economic superiority' is built on the 3rd. world.
2007-03-23 10:16:31 · answer #1 · answered by Pete Schwetty 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, they are much better treating their own than we are.
Democrats believe in the free market, not with the fact that 9,677 people in the US have almost ALL the money!
We aren't economically superior. You forget you are talking about multi-national corporations now, not American ones!
And you are right, we have never been a democracy. We are a Representative Republic! There are no true democracy's in the world that I know of. If we were a democracy, Bush would have never been president. In the 2004 elections he lost the popular vote to Gore!
2007-03-23 10:15:36 · answer #2 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
an excellent thought yet I say no. Karl Rove had mapped out "a long-lasting Republican majority" and watched it is useful indoors the unlawful redistricting of Texas. there replaced into no clarification for the social accumulating to think of of that McCain could lose. He led indoors the summertime polls for fairly a together as, undergo in strategies?. He enjoyed a much extra appropriate bounce on an analogous time as the unknown Palin replaced into presented, no longer understanding she could undo the marketing campaign. Had he picked Tim Pawlenty, we would have seen a closer race yet i think of of Obama would have won. My Republican uncle remember of factly stated until at last now the election "each and each man or woman is ill persons ideal now, truthfully like they have been of the Democrats indoors the previous, so we are waiting to spend time regrouping." In 2012, there will be a sacrficial lamb. we've yet to top prevalent whom.
2016-12-15 07:21:38 · answer #3 · answered by livesay 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Socialism reduces the quality of life of any society that follows it. This in turn causes political instability. So for the USA to promote this is detrimental to its own security.
2007-03-23 10:05:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, the world would think that the U.S. are hypocrites(not like they dont already) because how dare we promote something abroad without exercising it in our own nation.
2007-03-23 10:07:02 · answer #5 · answered by Jose G 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it should promote socialism at home. So the US will eventually be a democracy again.
2007-03-23 10:04:38 · answer #6 · answered by Longhaired Freaky Person 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No because in the free market voluntary transactions are mutually beneficial. WE are better off because China has liberalized its economy.
2007-03-23 10:10:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
When did liberals stop promoting socialism & communism , here & abroad ?
2007-03-23 10:05:17 · answer #8 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. With socialism comes repression of thought, faith and the press, in many intances.
2007-03-23 10:04:31 · answer #9 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no , socialism is not good in any case , do not voe for the socialist barack hussein osama
2007-03-23 10:06:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋