2007-03-23 09:49:25 · 4 answers · asked by Robin 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Often times, yes. There are several situations. One is where the guest of a landowner causes serious damage to another or another's property, and yes they should then be just as responsible, especially if the guest is a minor.
2007-03-23 09:56:49 · answer #1 · answered by cyanne2ak 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Any agreements or deeds signed with the help of minor are signed with the help of his Gaurdian till he turns into substantial and all of the deeds achieved with the help of minor are accountability of his Gaurdian or his mum and dad
2016-10-20 07:33:37 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you mean, "should Wal-Mart be responsible for the damage of a fender-bender in their parking lot"?
No.
2007-03-23 09:58:16 · answer #3 · answered by Michael E 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, that way landlowners will think twice before renting property to scumbags, or enabling dangerous or harmful activity.
2007-03-23 09:58:49 · answer #4 · answered by Jack Chedeville 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋