Albert Pujols & Scott Posednik for Johan Santana & Matt Holliday
2007-03-23 09:40:08 · 10 answers · asked by Maureen O 1 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
Pujols=awesome every batting category
Podsednik=steals and nothing else. You can find better on waivers
Santana=awesome every pitching category
Holliday=very good batting stats.
It seems like a 1st rounder and free agent for a 1st rounder and 3rd rounder. Santana and Holliday is the better pick.
2007-03-23 10:03:57 · answer #1 · answered by Michael Y 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you have a decent 1B say Paul Konerko or better, and you could use an OF and SP, this isn't such a bad trade. Posednik is a one category guy easily replaced by say a Chris Duffy if you really need a one dimensional seals guy. As great as Pujols is, getting the best pitcher and one of the best fantasy outfielders for Pujols is a nice trade for you. Holliday hit for nearly the same average as Pujols last year so you're basically losing some HR & RBI but gaining in K's ERA & Whip.
2007-03-23 11:04:09 · answer #2 · answered by bigdanabbott 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. Pujols = Best player now. Pods...a medicore outfielder, that's just getting back from an injury and a bad season. Johan is the best pitcher, but pitcher go once every 5 days or so. Albert will be playing everyday (knock on wood). Though Holliday did have a breakout year last season, I'd still stick with Pujols and Pods. Who knows perhaps, Pods can come back to his old form.
2007-03-23 09:48:37 · answer #3 · answered by zsherwood13 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, it depends if you need SP and OF. Matt Holiday is obviously the better outfielder. But, Johan Santana are the best pitcher and hitter in the game. I would say no to this trade because hitting staffs are harder to get than pitching. For pitching stats pitchers play about every five days, so its not as competitive when acquiring these kind of stats. But hitting is harder. In hitting the player plays daily making every little thing they do count. So, unless you really need OF and SP don't do the trade.
2007-03-23 09:45:27 · answer #4 · answered by Jake 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would do it. Pujols is the most dominant player in fantasy, btu Holliday puts up very good numbers, and is worth it. You are also getting Santana, who is the best overall SP in fantasy, for Podsednik, who can't do anythin but steal bases. I would do it in a heart beat.
2007-03-24 06:14:02 · answer #5 · answered by yahskaraghu 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Pujols is more than Santana and Posednik is a lot more than Holliday.
2007-03-23 10:37:45 · answer #6 · answered by Ari 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I am assumeing your giveing up Pujols. Honestly (depending on who you have backing up at 1b this is a very strong trade. Your getting the best Pitcher but your OF dramatically gets better. If you have a half way decent 1b (back up) this is a great trade for you and I would do it.
2007-03-23 10:36:44 · answer #7 · answered by Platlander 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't do the trade. You would be giving up a man that helps in Avg, Runs, Hits, HRs, 2bs, RBIs and another player that helps with SBs for an excellent pitcher but we all know pitchers wear down sooner then later and he will only help you every 5th game.
2007-03-23 09:46:06 · answer #8 · answered by jay p 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No because in most leagues hitters are more valuable than pitchers and pujols is the best hitter in the game
2007-03-23 11:22:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No
2007-03-23 09:43:51 · answer #10 · answered by Dr Universe 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋