Obviously, there is variation in both genders, but as a whole, women tend to be better at spatial/pattern problems, whereas men tend to be better at logical/mathematical problems. Nobody is "more intelligent"; people just have different skills.
2007-03-23 09:44:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by computerguy103 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
i think women, or men, that actually try and have this argument are pretty dull and insecure. i read an article recently about how scientists have recently proven that men are more intelligent than women, in the sense that people of a high IQ are more likely to be male than female. but it's not like all men are cleverer than all women. i am a female and i regularly meet men who are less intelligent than me. and what do IQ tests really mean? they don't measure focus, motivation, compassion, warmth.... i'm happy being a girl. i can only be me, nothing more nothing less.
stop trying to pick fights. it's silly.
2007-03-25 11:35:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by spiralling 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am intelligent and have been in lots of relationships. They did not work before not because I don't have a great body but I did not realize it takes two not one for a relationship to work. No matter how hard I worked on myself the people I was with did not do anything. My first husband wanted me to "work full time go to school and take care of him". His exact words, truth is if the man cannot make himself happy (same goes for the women) then the relationship will never work. One person is not responsible for the other persons happiness. The statement you made: how to keep a man happy and make a relationship work, which isn't exactly a recipe for solitude especially if you can spare some intelligence to keep yourself in shape. You obviously are alone and if you aren't you will be soon. You think someone is responsible for your happiness obviously. Think how selfish that sounds? Someone has to keep there body in shape to make you happy. Good luck... Does your spell check work?
2016-03-17 01:23:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, like those well known women Albert Einstein, Issac Newton, Noam Chomsky and Stephen Hawking.
That's a terrible generalisation. There is absolutely no credible scientific evidence to suggest women are more intelligent than men.
Although girls do better than boys in school, this is more likely to the process of socialisation and peer pressure making it more socally acceptable for females to take education seriously as opposed to males.
2007-03-23 09:46:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by shy_voo 3
·
7⤊
0⤋
Studies suggest the opposite in fact. The average IQ of a woman is INFERIOR by 5 points. Men are about 10 times more likely to have staggering high IQs than women. Also women are supposed to have more white matter then men, or less grey matter and therefore in relation more white matter, I forgot.
2007-03-23 11:17:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
You can't generalise like this,There are very intelligent members of both sexes and you would not find one of the more intelligent females asking a question like this. Sure there are a lot of neanderthals out there but quite a lot of not very bright ladies also.This point of view would be held by a woman who considered herself to be a well educate middle or upper class person superior to most of the men she encountered.
2007-03-23 09:55:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
From the sex that calls males chauvanistic, you take the cake lady. Women are NOT more intelligent than men. I am more intelligent than any female I know, and being gay, I know quite a few females. Show me the study that called women more intelligent than men, and I will show you a sex-biased scientific study that was sent by femenazis to degrade men.
Now, talking as IF women were SMARTER (I think it is imprudent to generalize that way) then it would be because they mature hormonally and emotionally quicker, therefore focusing less time on figuring their horomones out throughough adolescence where most material is learned.
2007-03-23 09:45:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by deadwhisperer 3
·
4⤊
2⤋
Yes, women are so much smarter than men. That's why most Nobel winner are men, most of the greatest thinkers in history are men...and don't tell me it's because males have controlled women throughout history, because EVERYONE knows brains always win over brawn. Right?
2007-03-24 15:19:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Women are stupid. 99% of all achievement in science, the arts, business is due to men, not women. Even today, when women have as many or even more choices than men do, you see very little achievement by women. The computer, engineering andn science schools are filled with men.
It was proven a while ago that women's IQs vary less than do men's, the bell curve is more spread out for men and there are more men who are either stupider or smarter than women. Another study stated that men's IQs were on average 3.6 points higher than women's.
But this all makes sense, because it takes no talent or brains for women to get all the sex, love, relationships, money they want merely by spreading their legs. Men DO have to have talent or brains or skills to get any of this.
Also, I noticed women are intimidated by smarter guys, they seem to choose stupider men to be with. Women do not think a guy is a MAN unless he is into sports like football. So many men get into sports because they know it makes them seem more macho and manly.
Women also seem to like to blame men for their own bad choices, which is not too smart a move because ti only makes men hate and resent women more for being so immature and irresponsible and childish.
2007-03-24 16:08:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by brightstar65 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
And, this 'Scientific Proof' you speak of is what?
And ~ 'women are much more upgraded than men' ~ Just what is that supposed to mean? Up-graded to What and from What.?
It could be suggested in your argument (if I were to choose to call it one) that this is so because > 'Women don't spend so much time on football' < and but ~ 'because they spend so much valuable time buying for their shoe and handbag collections.'
Now, if you'd added that to your 'argument,' it might have swayed me into agreeing with you.
However. Sorry, but you failed, Squire.
Good luck with the next one.
Sash.
2007-03-23 15:05:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by sashtou 7
·
1⤊
0⤋