My opinion is, that the dangerous dogs act will only work if the police and the general public work together and the police should have a specific section of officers who, when a member of the public contacts them with proof of a dog behaving dangerously, will go out and remove the dog from that persons care, permanently.
Those people that own more than 1 dog that behaves dangerously should be banned from having dogs for life and if they disobey that, then they should recieve an extremely long prison sentence that isnt suspended.
What do you think?
2007-03-23 09:33:42 · 4 answers · asked by Unhinged.... 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Every one who has a dog should be tagged or have a known address and have a note of what dog they have if its a known danerous dg it should be A:Taken away or B:Wear a muzzle.Well thats my opinion i dont know about your email me on yours!!
2007-03-24 09:42:26 · answer #1 · answered by samsuki 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i did not see the instruct... yet i had to remark on the area. I agree in a suited international this might artwork, yet we regrettably do not stay in a suited international. There must be a miles better way of imposing animal abuse regulations. There are purely some states the place the humane society has any type of "police" authority. If we ought to inspire state and native governments to make individuals of the SPCA and HS authoritive figures with arresting features. this might help enforce those regulations. the unhappy certainty is that the HS and SPCA's are caught in "long lines" in court docket and can't get the help necessary from close by police till now there is minimum quantities of knowledge in a case left and the criminal gets off with a slap on the wrist and a "chatting with" via a passionate animal administration individual who they haven't any interest in listening to. the final wager for now could be Take pictures, be a snoopy snooperton get any records that can assist your close by government with any data you could wisely and LEAGALLY assemble. additionally if we grant extra loose approaches for human beings to coach their animals there could be much less occorances of "risky canine" a large style of the so-observed as Dang. canine are purely Untrained (and in turn) exceeded over canine. Be a solid puppy proprietor spay or nuter, practice, and LOVE your animals.
2016-10-19 11:05:08 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just ban all dogs. That is what the Labour party are good at. Asking them to deal with the real issues that has led to a society in moral free fall, is a waste of time, because they are the ones causing it.
2007-03-23 09:45:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
unless there working dogs they should be shot.postman speaking hear .hate em all.
2007-03-23 10:04:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋