when this president and this pro religious fanatic idiot adminisrtation is gone then they still won't stop but they won't be able to suceed. As long as the republicans cater to the religious right they will keep pushing because they see their opportunity to suceed. So either vote democrat or if you choose to be a republican make your opinion known. The republican party has moved to the fanatic right and must move center again.
2007-03-23 09:32:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by snoopy22564 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
i'm professional determination for a similar reason that i'm professional 2d modification. i hit upon the implications of those positions much less disgusting and frightening than a central authority that would usurp those rights by ability of stress. on a similar time as i hit upon the possibility of destroying a fetus interior the womb reprehensible, i does no longer prefer to stay in a rustic the place a woman is compelled to have a toddler on the factor of a gun. while it comes all the way down to it, all and sundry has their very very own opinion on the cost of a fetus at extremely some tiers of progression. some people have confidence that as quickly because of the fact the gamete is formed there's a soul there too that desires preserving. Others have confidence that once a mom makes a decision she would not prefer a toddler that organism will become a parasite feeding off her physique. And, of course, there is an entire spectrum in between. With such massively dissenting critiques from every physique you meet, is it correct to legislate one way or the different? What makes one opinion greater valid than the subsequent? I applaud your for using rational thought to the subject. and that i think which you're splendid. Making abortion thoroughly unlawful will in basic terms effect in greater hanger revenues. Kevin, why do no longer you ever % a ultimate answer? you frequently permit it pass into vote casting it incredibly is susceptible. Do you even study the solutions you get carry of?
2016-10-01 09:28:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by barksdale 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Im not no religious fanatic but i dont believe in abortion unless you were raped, incest or you have a medical problem, that of course has to be proven by a doc, that will cause harm to you or that child. Things like that.
I feel if a person THINKS they are responsible enough to have UNPROTECTED SEX then they should be responsible enough to take care of the consequences of that. This meaning kids!
I have a genetic defect that could seriously harm a child if i wasnt on a certain diet during pregnancy. This is a very strict diet. Look up Phenylketonuria (PKU). That is what i have. But specifically read what it says about MATERNAL PKU. I would just put that in..maternal pku. It will take you right to it and tell you all about it.
When i was 18 i had to have a termination b/c my levels were out of control, meaning my child would have been mentally retarded or could have died or many other things. Just depends. This scarred me for life. To this day i think of that child. It would have been born in October of 2000.
I am now the mother of two beautiful boys who are just fine with no problems but ONLY b/c i was on this diet immediately after i found out i was pregnant. And stayed on it through my whole pregnancy.
So, yes, i am against abortion unless something has happened to them as i stated in the beginning. I have been through it. I know what it does to you. I know its something you just dont forget and get over.
IF a person thinks they are responsible enough to have UNPROTECTED SEX and they get pregnant from it, then they need to GROW UP and take care of something that they created by doing something they thought they could handle. THAT IS THEIR RESPONSIBILITY!
THERE IS ALWAYS ADOPTION AS WELL!
2007-03-23 09:36:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sweetie 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
Abortion is not a religious issue, it is a human issue.
I saw the sonagram of my second daughter at 8 weeks. She had a heartbeat, brain activity, fingers, toes, eyes. She wasn't very pretty yet, but she was definitely a child and with a life worth living. I almost lost her at 16 weeks gestation and by that time she was already perfectly formed. The doctors offered to abort her at that time because they were concerned for my health. I chose life for both of us. Today she is a happy, well-adjusted, and thank God, healthy teenager.
A life is a life, no matter how young. If a man can be charged with murder for killing a child in the womb of its' mother, then that mother has no right to murder her child either.
This does not stem from my belief in a higher power or God if you will. But from the factual evidence I have seen with my own eyes, or are you going to now insist that sonagrams are the work of some vast right-wing conspiracy?
You should think of it this way. You wouldn't be spewing this drivel if your mother hadn't chosen life.
2007-03-23 09:33:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
since when do you have to be religious to be against the murder of the unborn.
I wonder why if it's not murder you libs don't want the mother to see the ultrasound before they make a decision like that?
87% change their minds, that's why!!
What about late term were they pull all but the head out and stick the baby's brain with a scalpel so they can say it wasn't born yet? It's a sick murderous act .
It's called population control, just ask the communist.
The unborn are innocent to the evil of the world
2007-03-23 09:37:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Whenever you take away the fact that this country was founded on religion then I'll step back and take a second. When ever you prove to me that abortion is not murder and that a baby inside the womb indeed does not have a beating heart then I'll pull back and decide not to say this anymore but until someone proves to me that a baby inside the womb that is aborted is already dead when its aborted I will continue to not support abortion because its murder and I think we should have thousands of women in prison for it.
2007-03-23 09:27:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
At conception, there is a future person, needing nurishment to grow.
With rare exception, like rape, pregnancy could be prevented by using birth control. I know that sometimes birth control may fail which is why some people who are firmly set against having an unwanted baby, employ more than one method at a time -- like foam and condoms simultaneously.
Do you think abortion should be used as a substitute for birth control?
2007-03-23 09:27:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by TheHumbleOne 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Reason
Cause and Effect
Broader Considerations!
All the good principles have to appeal to the above forces!
"Abortion should be made legal, stating sensible reason to do so." Any way it shouldnt be made too easy. This can be very dangerous. And it is a different topic of discussion.
2007-03-24 05:15:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I thought they had stopped. I will go out there and tell them to stop. I'll use the old, tried and true threat: "I''ll turn this car right around, and there'll be no vacation for anybody!" That usually works. Especially if I add in that "I WAS getting ready to stop for ice cream, but I can't take unruly children [or protesters] into a public place." That should do it.
2007-03-23 09:29:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
The one thing I've always heard on here about Christians is that we are not tolerant. Asking us to go against our religious beliefs is not being tolerant of us. You can't have it both ways. All we are doing is voicing our opinion and that is our right. I hear people everyday protesting the war. I do not agree with them but I absolutely support their right to speak their opinion. Why don't you try showing some maturity and tolerance for others.
2007-03-23 09:27:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by jim h 6
·
2⤊
1⤋