2007-03-23 09:10:38 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Yes, that's why it was such a botched failure.
2007-03-23 09:13:19 · answer #1 · answered by Studbolt Slickrock Deux 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
No, much evidence was uncovered, mainly after the US went into Iraq, that outside forces were responsible for the WTC attacks. You see, most people like to believe the liberals saying that our attack on Iraq had nothing to do with terrorism. They want to say it is all about oil, well, lets look at it for a minute.
1. Oil - partly true. Do you want Iran or the likes of them to control 2/3 of the worlds oil resources? Some of you remember the oil embargo of the early 70's when you could only buy a limited amount of gas on odd and even days.
2. Terrorism - Saddam supported all kinds of terrorists groups just like Iran and Syria do. Yes, they had training camps and some of their graduates have taken part in everything from the Marine Barracks in Lebanon to the US Embassies in West Africa.
3. WTC - well, terrorists messed up the first attack in 93, but made up for it in the second attack. The lucky part was they hit it early and the lose of life, while tragic, was much less than they were going for. Had they attacked 45 mins or an hour later, each tower would have had several more thousand people in them so, much higher lose of life.
4. Clinton Mess up - Turn the clock back and yes, Reagan missed some of the signs back in the mid 80's. Clinton and Bush both, dropped the ball prior to 911.
There is more than enough blame to go around. The only real question is, do we get serious and finish what we started and get out of Iraq after a win, or do we tuck tail and leave like we did in Viet Nam??? Yes, we took second place there, none of the goals we set were ever accomplished. How many thousands in the south died after the NVA took over??? Most Liberals dont want to talk about that or Laos or Cambodia. Pol Pot slaughtered sever thousands. they are still finding the mass graves.
We as a nation need to reign in our leaders and set a course for the future. Turning our backs on the world is not the answer. Following the UN is not the answer because they have no clout. They cannot back up what they do. Without US funding, the UN would dry up and blow away.
Not a bad idea if you ask me!
2007-03-23 09:26:36 · answer #2 · answered by George C 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No more than the 9/11 was an inside job by the Bush Admin.
No proof of any such thing.
2007-03-23 09:13:35 · answer #3 · answered by wizjp 7 · 7⤊ 1⤋
Actually it was the doing of Socks and Buddy! Don't you remember the movie, Cats and Dogs? The movie was telling the truth! No, Hillary cannot be president, she already served two terms in office!
2007-03-23 10:20:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Unbelievable...cant blame it on the terrorists...tried GW but the FACTS got in the way...now trying Clinton...Do you love the Muzzie scum that much to try and divert the blame?
AND I DON"T EVEN LIKE CLINTON...thats the scary part defending him...ewwwwwwww....lol
2007-03-23 09:19:41 · answer #5 · answered by Real Estate Para Legal 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What are you smoking? The extremists declared war on the west long ago. We just woke up to it on 9/11.
2007-03-23 09:14:04 · answer #6 · answered by chikkenbone 3 · 6⤊ 1⤋
and the sky is purple. get a life, and stop worrying about things
2007-03-23 09:16:15 · answer #7 · answered by plhudson01 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, it was actually aliens from Saturn.
You're not wearing a tinfoil hat right now are you?
2007-03-23 09:13:41 · answer #8 · answered by Josh 3 · 5⤊ 1⤋
yes and he was responsible for the black plague and the Spanish Inquisition too, can you believe it?
2007-03-23 09:16:43 · answer #9 · answered by Sir Hard & Thick 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Actually it was 1991 and no, Clinton had nothing to do with it.
Oops -2001.
2007-03-23 09:15:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 6⤋
Shut Up Retard
2007-03-23 09:13:30 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋