Yahoo fantasy b-ball rotisserie should i trade zito. He has a solid history but santana is in a weaker division and has good upside. Zito also is in nl with weaker lineups. I can't choose help!
2007-03-23 08:00:34 · 8 answers · asked by Eric E 2 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
Normally I would but I think Zito has a chance at putting up better numbers than usual being in SF as well as the lesser hitting NL. Don't make the deal, keep Zito.
2007-03-23 08:53:38 · answer #1 · answered by Rckets 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Zito is in the NL where the lineups is not as strong and the hitters dont know him as well. Zito will be a NL cy young canidate. Santanas division isnt as weak as you think texas, seattle will be better and if yourwe an angels fan you know what the A's can do
2007-03-23 08:50:01 · answer #2 · answered by Lord Vader 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Keep Zito no question. Any pitcher going to from the AL to the NL is at an advantage. Santana has to prove himself first. I would not take that trade.
Check out other sports fans opinions at www.rootzoo.com!
2007-03-23 08:06:15 · answer #3 · answered by RootZoo.com 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES!!! Do the deal. Santana is a stud in the making. Zito is on the decline. Santana is a K machine.
2007-03-23 08:03:52 · answer #4 · answered by holbrpa 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say do this trade. Santana is younger and looking to be a very strong pitcher. he will have more SO and a better win total (more run support)
Era and Whip should be the same on both sides.
Yahoo rankings also have Santana better.
I would do this trade.
2007-03-23 10:41:07 · answer #5 · answered by Platlander 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. As much as I like Scherzer and Buchholz, Johnson is too good to give up for that. Zito is a waste. Dempster is better, but still isn't very good.
2016-03-29 01:11:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No i dont think you do it unless it is a keeper league.
2007-03-23 08:07:37 · answer #7 · answered by Smartest Man Alive 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
good trade
2007-03-25 16:51:56 · answer #8 · answered by jerry 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋